I'd like to know where your data for British schools failing children?
^Wait a minute, your school wanted to put you on prescription medication for something you did in Kindergarten ? That's just messed up.
That's my general thought, not to mention I see it as a failure of self control on the parent's part.If you have to hit a child to get them to do what you want them to do, they've outsmarted you.
I'd like to know where your data for British schools failing children?
It's not my opinion, it's the Royal Society of Chemistry's.
For everyone who thinks they turned out "better" because they were spanked/hit/thrown against a wall, and the today's society is too easy on kids, try to remember that for generations, kids were spanked at home and strapped and beaten in schools and the world still had robbery, extortion, raping, murder and spitting on the sidewalk. The days of hard discipline on children didn't give us a better society...
Oh right, I forgot about the time we could leave our front doors open and go to the shop without fear of being robbed. Yes crime existed but no where near to the extent it does today. Crime is rising faster and faster by the month.
I can't say I'm too eager to get involved in this debate, but I do want to refute this. Violent crime has been on an enormous downward spiral since the 1970's. A downward spiral for decades.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/17/statscan-crime.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-09-09-crime_x.htm
http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_3_ny_cops.html
A number of police forces in England and Wales have been undercounting some of the most serious violent crimes, the government has admitted.
It means figures for serious violent crimes rose by 22% compared to last year - rather than showing a fall as previous figures appeared to indicate.
The mistake happened when some crimes classed as "grievous bodily harm with intent" were recorded as less serious.
The government says it does not know how long the undercounting has been going on - leading to concerns that figures on violent crime may have been wrong for up to a decade.
Most of that is false. Most of the time a spank is to inflict a shock to the system to break a child out of a behavior they are intent on and get their attention. That is it. It immediately sets boundries and returns control of a situation to the parent and away from the child.
It does not teach a child to deal with problems with violence. I don't know where that idocy came from. There are many times that you will be unable to reason with a child and that is where spanking comes in. Because of some of her behavior my niece has been to see a counselor and now has gained more control. When she's in trouble and they are resoning with her she declares she wants a private conversation with either one of her parents. They go off in a private area, away from the situation and people involved and what she's affecting and nothing ends up happening and she again does the same stuff all over again.
No, not really. I hope you're not making the mistake of thinking children are capable of reasoning as adults, because they can't, they just aren't mentally mature enough until they get to be about 12 (in general). Spanking establishes an unpleasant consequence for bad behavior as well as helping to establish boundaries. But then spanking isn't simply "hitting" a child, either. That's why only an open hand should be used on their bottom, because the idea is to get the kid's attention and to punish them, not to injure them.If you have to hit a child to get them to do what you want them to do, they've outsmarted you.
It depends on the parent. My parents at times could, and to be honest I resented that they used a belt more than anything else. There were also definitely times just explaining something to me would've worked much better than spanking me, but that's a matter of perspective (an adult looking back on childhood) and judgment. This is also why it's important to be as calm as possible while meting out punishment, so it doesn't come off as the parent simply getting angry and losing control to the child.That's my general thought, not to mention I see it as a failure of self control on the parent's part.
No, not really. I hope you're not making the mistake of thinking children are capable of reasoning as adults, because they can't, they just aren't mentally mature enough until they get to be about 12 (in general). Spanking establishes an unpleasant consequence for bad behavior as well as helping to establish boundaries. But then spanking isn't simply "hitting" a child, either. That's why only an open hand should be used on their bottom, because the idea is to get the kid's attention and to punish them, not to injure them.If you have to hit a child to get them to do what you want them to do, they've outsmarted you.
But isn't being 16 years old make her a little too old to be spanked like a baby?
Yes, really.
Riiiight....I am well aware of what children's mental capacities are. In fact, I'm an expert.
Have you ever had to take care of kids? Seriously. It isn't a competition, you can't "lose" with them. All my years of experience, all my learning and creativity and wisdom leads me to leave spanking as an option if other alternatives fail. Again, children do not have the capacity to reason as adults, so at times negative reinforcement is the only thing that can work. If more parents did this, children in general would probably be a lot more well-behaved, and wouldn't have the kind of "entitled" attitude so many seem to exhibit today.If you cannot come up with any way of correcting behavior without hitting your kids, you've been defeated. All your years of experience, all your learning and creativity and wisdom, and that's the best you can do?
Actually, no, it's not a euphamism, it's descriptive of what's happening, namely slapping the buttocks with something.What's more disturbing to me is that "Spanking" is a nice little euphamism parents like to use to lessen the impact of what they are doing.
It is if the purpose actually is to discipline one's child. You keep attempting to use allegories that simply aren't compatable with a child misbehaving and a parent giving them a few swats on the ass in order to discipline them. That isn't the same as a drunken asshole coming home and using his wife or kids as a punching bag.Most people who perpetrate domestic violence either blame the victim ("I wouldn't hit her if she'd just shut up!") or rationalize the violence ("It's for her own good"). Hitting your children is no different.
Link?Besides, studies show parents are poor judges of how much and how hard they spank. Parents frequently undercount the number of "swats" and the pressure/force exerted by their blows.
I don't care how you raise your children if indeed you have them or ever have them in the future, but please don't force your warped views on others by accusing them of abusing their children.Dress it up, give it cute little nicknames, and justify it all you want. Hitting kids is poor parenting in my opinion, and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
The psychological damage done to a child by being totally dependent on someone who does violence to them can be devastating.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.