Their Kickstarter is at about 220 000$ with 11 days to go. A really decent amount but still far from their hoped-for final goal.
Their Kickstarter is at about 220 000$ with 11 days to go. A really decent amount but still far from their hoped-for final goal.
Their Kickstarter is at about 220 000$ with 11 days to go. A really decent amount but still far from their hoped-for final goal.
It's the swearing.![]()
After reading through this thread, it seems to only offend 90+ percent of the people born with a stick up their ass. I'd consider that an added bonus!It serves to offend a large percentage of the viewers.![]()
After reading through this thread, it seems to only offend 90+ percent of the people born with a stick up their ass. I'd consider that an added bonus!It serves to offend a large percentage of the viewers.![]()
This.![]()
I find techno-babble in Star Trek a LOT more offensive to my intelligence than what the Klingons called Kate Vernon's character.
I don't mind at all that in this instance they got ''real''...
So I agree with 137th Gebirg...
Define "large percentage". Is there any scientific evidence and links supporting your statements, or are you positing your opinion as fact?
I could just as easily say that a large percentage of the fandom is not offended by any of it (such as myself), and it would be just as valid (or invalid, as the case may be) as saying the opposite.
I quite love techno-babble, because it manages to put more science into fiction.
Localyokel said:Does anyone know if they still plan on releasing this this year?
This is especially true when the tertiary modulating framostat starts to go into metagenic overload at the quantum-phase threshold.I quite love techno-babble, because it manages to put more science into fiction.
You do realize that the 'babble' part of 'techno-babble' was babble with no real science backing it up?
I quite love techno-babble, because it manages to put more science into fiction.
You do realize that the 'babble' part of 'techno-babble' was babble with no real science backing it up?
I quite love techno-babble, because it manages to put more science into fiction.
You do realize that the 'babble' part of 'techno-babble' was babble with no real science backing it up?
Yes, that's where the fiction part jumps in, my friend.![]()
Define "large percentage". Is there any scientific evidence and links supporting your statements, or are you positing your opinion as fact?
I could just as easily say that a large percentage of the fandom is not offended by any of it (such as myself), and it would be just as valid (or invalid, as the case may be) as saying the opposite.
My mistake. The name "bitch, whore" is now officially not offensive so say a large percentage.
You do realize that the 'babble' part of 'techno-babble' was babble with no real science backing it up?
Yes, that's where the fiction part jumps in, my friend.![]()
I'm confused. It added no science to the show at all which conflicts with the statement above.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.