• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Can we all agree that 31 had a huge roll in winning the war

An big problem here is the aforementioned clairvoyance aspect. Humans cannot foretell the full consequences of their action; however, the Prophets apparently can. At the end of the day, it proved impossible to collapse the wormhole - but quite possible to render it impassable by making friends with the Prophets.

Trying to butt heads with the Prophets would have been genocide, too. Granted, offing the genus of Prophets might have been slightly less sinful than offing the trillions of souls associated with the Dominion, but it would probably closely match offing the genus of Founders. And trying to argue that lesser evil is categorically allowed in fighting greater evil doesn't seem to be up your alley, any more than it is up mine. It'd have to be case-by-case, and this particular case just doesn't sound like something where I'd side with a putative S31 plan to destroy the Celestial Temple.

In general, trying to play nice costs lives - just have a look at WWII. But this isn't a good argument for not playing nice. I'm on the side of the party that refused to pursue attacks against the Celestial Temple, then; doesn't mean I'd much appreciate the plan to murder or blackmail the Founders.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Yet its odd that Sisko and co on two seperate occassions had no moral problem with attempting to collapse the wormhole to prevent the Dominion coming through. Especially as in the second case (In Purgatory's Shadow) they had a way to do it without harming the Prophets.
 
As said, the Federation does its share of genocide. And Sisko is a murderer by profession. It's not always easy to associate with these heroes, just as it's not easy to always condemn the appointed villains.

In the first attempt at collapsing the wormhole ("The Search"), I am certainly opposed to the path Sisko took. Genocide merely in the name of a delaying action (granted, seven decades' worth, but still) doesn't sound justified. In the second attempt, I can but shrug at the ingenuity of the enemy in turning this disaster into a triumph for them - and at Sisko's lack of foresight or initiative, as he never seemed to consider asking the Prophets pretty please, despite already having evidence that they listen to the right kind of reason.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Question: With beings as powerful and advanced as the Prophets could the wormhole/Celestial Temple be permanently collapsed? They made it, surely they could remake it.
 
As said, the Federation does its share of genocide. And Sisko is a murderer by profession. It's not always easy to associate with these heroes, just as it's not easy to always condemn the appointed villains.

In the first attempt at collapsing the wormhole ("The Search"), I am certainly opposed to the path Sisko took. Genocide merely in the name of a delaying action (granted, seven decades' worth, but still) doesn't sound justified. Timo Saloniemi

That first attempt never really happened though, it was part a Changling version of a holodeck story.
 
There is no proof that collapsing the Wormhole would kill the prophets in the first place. Besides as a Secret Society, a super virus makes more sense then potentially opening a new front against extremely advanced Aliens. Not to mention they want to expand Federation dominance into that Quadrant eventually and its alot easier to hid their virus plan then it is to hide cutting off the wormhole.

Although its easier for Sisko to just ask and mining the wormhole does the same thing essentially.
 
Last edited:
There is no proof that collapsing the Wormhole would kill the prophets in the first place.
True enough - but asking would be helpful in this respect, too. And it's probably still safer to assume that "collapsing one's house poses a risk to one" than that "the Dominion will attack"...

The scenario we got never rang particularly true anyway. The wormhole is a choke point, and even an invincible fleet of hundreds of thousands of ships should be relatively easily stopped by 300 Spartan class ships wielding nothing more exotic than standard phasers and photon torpedoes. If the Feds feared war with the Dominion, they could have fired on those Dominion shipments with impunity (at any point, including the key moments of "By Inferno's Light") and laughed at feeble Dominion accusations of unfair aggression. That sort of violence would have been directed at the exact deserving target, without risk to outsiders or innocents, or even to the UFP public image much.

Timo Saloniemi
 
So your saying they should have just camped out at the entrance and shot up anything that crossed? Self Replicating Mine Field basically did the same thing without forcing them to commit 300 Ships. Although your plan works fine if they stop up the entrance before the Dominion gains a foothold after better off using mines becuase u cannot afford to have 300 Ships sitting around just guarding an entrance.
 
The funny thing is, they did have 300 ships there right about the time the Dominion first came through. At that time, the station's weapons were sabotaged; at any later date, the station could have done the guarding all by itself, seeing how well it did against at least 40 Klingon ships that were allowed to swarm all around it in 3D.

A mayhem in time saves nine, I guess. But again, it would have taken a bit of foreknowledge to understand that a decisive stand in "By Inferno's Light" or even an eternal vigil by 300 ships would still have cost less than the war ended up costing. And relations with the Dominion might have remained a bit better... Now they know that mankind is no good and absolutely has to be eradicated. :(

Timo Saloniemi
 
Section 31 did not help win the war; the Romulan Imperial Fleet and Klingon Defense Force helped win the war. Section 31's virus merely drove the Female Shapeshifter to decide to order the Jem'Hadar to give the Federation a Pyrrhic victory by refusing to surrender, and to order the extermination of the Cardassian race.

And that's to say nothing of their completely backfired attempt to prevent the Augment virus from spreading throughout the 22nd Century Klingon Empire by allowing Phlox to be kidnapped. I mean, seriously, they were surprised when the Klingons went back on their deal.

Section 31 is utterly incompetent. Anyone who defends them is doing so because they have authoritarian personalities and like to fantasize about men with guns who aren't answerable to anyone.

^ There to provide plausible deniability to those in positions of power within the Federation governing body. Maybe even as high as the Federation President, remember Sloan said there was a section 31 representative in the President's office.

No. Bashir was reading Sloan's memories, and discovered that Section 31 had an agent in President Jaresh-Inyo's Cabinet, not his office. In other words, he discovered that Section 31 was spying on the democratically-elected government.

But would the upper management of section 31 have been touched? Maybe a few, but those at the very top? Unlikely, because they're protected but the strongest of shields.

Elected office.

Uh, no. "Inquisition" made it very clear that Section 31 does not answer to anyone in the Federation government -- it doesn't answer to anyone whatsoever.

S31, in essence, won the war for the Feds. Which does not at all seem to be the lesson the writers wanted us to take away from the story, but if so, they should have written a different story.

If the idea was to have S31 be the bad guys, well too late because the Dominion and the Cardassians already occupied that position.

Pure nonsense. Section 31 can be bad guys just as easily as the Dominion and Cardassians. There's no rule that says that the bad guys are always on the other side from the protagonists in a story about a war.

Well except for the fact that they aren't. there a bunch of terrorists ...

The fact that apparently the Federation needed a organization like S31 to carry out the activities that S31 did, speaks ill of both Starfleet and Starfleet intelligence.

There is no reason to think that the Federation "needs" Section 31.

If the Federation's governace didn't have a S31, why didn't they?

Because no government wants to have an organized crime ring that operates beyond its control, obviously.

Remember, Section 31 is not like the CIA or MI-6. It's not the Federation's intelligence/black ops agency. It's an organization that does not answer to the Federation government, does not take orders from the President. It's more akin to the Mafia than the Mossad.

I remember a line in Ashes of Eden where Kirk said something along the lines of "If the federation can only survive by threats, bribery, treachery, deceit and murder, then it does not deserve to survive."
<SNIP>

2) "What's the alternative?"

Liberal democracy and the rule of law.
 
Funny-huge-roll-of-toilet-paper.jpg
 
virus merely drove the Female Shapeshifter to decide to order the Jem'Hadar to give the Federation a Pyrrhic victory by refusing to surrender, and to order the extermination of the Cardassian race.

This part sounds highly dubious. What reason would we have to believe that Cardassians wouldn't have been slaughtered for what they did in "The Die is Cast" already? Letting them live would have been reneging on a deal, and the Dominion wouldn't want to look untrustworthy like that!

When you add to this the fact that the virus was the leverage that prevented said slaughter, you simply have to accept that the bioweapon plot did more good than damage in the short term.

In the long term, of course, the Federation got moved from the tail end of the "conquer at leisure" list to the top of the "deadly and devious threat - eliminate ASAP" one...

Timo Saloniemi
 
When you add to this the fact that the virus was the leverage that prevented said slaughter, you simply have to accept that the bioweapon plot did more good than damage in the short term.
Timo Saloniemi

Versus collapsing/mining the entrance of the wormhole?
No.
 
virus merely drove the Female Shapeshifter to decide to order the Jem'Hadar to give the Federation a Pyrrhic victory by refusing to surrender, and to order the extermination of the Cardassian race.

This part sounds highly dubious. What reason would we have to believe that Cardassians wouldn't have been slaughtered for what they did in "The Die is Cast" already?

Paying attention to the Female Shapeshifter's behavior. Before becoming ill with the virus, she was calm and stoic -- manipulative and authoritarian, but also a rational political actor. As she became ill, she began to lament her race's inevitable extinction at the hands of Section 31's virus, and she started to become an irrational political actor. She became prone to fits of rage. It was in one of these fits that she ordered the Cardassians exterminated upon the Cardassian fleet's defection, and it was as a result of her increasing irrationality that she ordered the Jem'Hadar and Breen to fight to the last man rather than do the logical thing.

The closer she and the rest of the Founders came to death, the more irrational she became, and the more destructive her orders became. Had there been no virus, she would almost certainly have ordered a Dominion surrender at the Battle of Cardassia with an intent to withdraw and then later re-invade. The Federation would then have had the opportunity to rebuild and thwart the Dominion's later plans. By infecting the Founders, Section 31 provoked the Female Shapeshifter into ordering a Pyrrhic for the UFP -- only Odo's offer of a cure staved that off. Had there been no cure, thousands more Federates would have lost their lives. Had there been no virus, Federation loses would have been minimized because the Dominion fleet had already effectively been won through conventional means.

When you add to this the fact that the virus was the leverage that prevented said slaughter, you simply have to accept that the bioweapon plot did more good than damage in the short term.

No, the offer of a cure by a third party -- an officer in the Bajoran Militia who was of her same species, and who was certainly not a Federate -- was what prevented the slaughter.
 
It was in one of these fits that she ordered the Cardassians exterminated upon the Cardassian fleet's defection, and it was as a result of her increasing irrationality that she ordered the Jem'Hadar and Breen to fight to the last man rather than do the logical thing.
What logical thing? There would have been no possible reason to hold back the Jem'Hadar - they were bred to die, and if they didn't fight till the very last, their potential would be wasted. The only logic in surrender was that it could buy the antidote to the bioweapon.

Had the Founder simply died before the end, her second-in-command would no doubt have had instructions to ensure that the Cardassian species no longer would be.

she would almost certainly have ordered a Dominion surrender at the Battle of Cardassia with an intent to withdraw and then later re-invade.
Makes no sense. She could re-invade equally well without withdrawing, with fresh forces, provided the wormhole were opened at some point. If it weren't, she couldn't re-invade no matter what.

the offer of a cure by a third party -- an officer in the Bajoran Militia who was of her same species, and who was certainly not a Federate -- was what prevented the slaughter
Cure by any party would have accomplished the result at that desperate situation. If the identity of the benefactor mattered, S31 could have generated the suitable sort at a moment's notice.

Also to be remembered here is that the death of all Cardassians would have been a positive outcome for the Federation, in the thinking of the organization that created the bioweapon (be it S31, Starfleet or somebody else with similar interests)...

Timo Saloniemi
 
virus merely drove the Female Shapeshifter to decide to order the Jem'Hadar to give the Federation a Pyrrhic victory by refusing to surrender, and to order the extermination of the Cardassian race.
This part sounds highly dubious. What reason would we have to believe that Cardassians wouldn't have been slaughtered for what they did in "The Die is Cast" already?

Paying attention to the Female Shapeshifter's behavior. Before becoming ill with the virus, she was calm and stoic -- manipulative and authoritarian, but also a rational political actor. As she became ill, she began to lament her race's inevitable extinction at the hands of Section 31's virus, and she started to become an irrational political actor. She became prone to fits of rage. It was in one of these fits that she ordered the Cardassians exterminated upon the Cardassian fleet's defection, and it was as a result of her increasing irrationality that she ordered the Jem'Hadar and Breen to fight to the last man rather than do the logical thing.

The closer she and the rest of the Founders came to death, the more irrational she became, and the more destructive her orders became. Had there been no virus, she would almost certainly have ordered a Dominion surrender at the Battle of Cardassia with an intent to withdraw and then later re-invade. The Federation would then have had the opportunity to rebuild and thwart the Dominion's later plans. By infecting the Founders, Section 31 provoked the Female Shapeshifter into ordering a Pyrrhic for the UFP -- only Odo's offer of a cure staved that off. Had there been no cure, thousands more Federates would have lost their lives. Had there been no virus, Federation loses would have been minimized because the Dominion fleet had already effectively been won through conventional means.

I can see your point of her becoming more irrational a leader as the virus progressed. It is a very interesting idea.

Just one bit, which in no way takes away from you argument, but the Female Shapeshifter didn't start ordering the destruction of Cardassian cities and the killing of the Cardassians until the civilian population began revolting against the Dominion. It was that act that turned the Cardassian fleet against the Dominion an Breen fleets.
 
I would actually argue that the FC becoming irrational was to the advantage of the Allies--and therefore, this "side effect" of the virus was a good thing.

As Sun Tzu said:

Assess the advantage in takign advice, than structure your forces accordingly, to suppliment extraordinary tactics. Forces are to be structured strategically, based on what is advantageous.

And:

The one who figures on victory at headquarters before even doing battle is the one who has the most strategic factors on his side.

Therefore, effective war strategy requires rationality, and coolness of head and composure of mind.

On the other hand, as Sun Tzu warned:

When you do battle, even if you are winning [like the Dominion felt they were for much of the war], if you continue for a lomg time it will dull your forces and blunt your edge; if you besiege a citadel, your strength will be exhausted. If you keep your armies [in this case, the Jem'Hadar] out in the field for a long time, your supplies will be insufficient.

When your forces are dulled, your edge is blunted, your strength is exhausted, and your supplies are gone, then others will take advantage of your debility and rise up. Then even if you have wise advisors [which I assume was the point of the Vorta, in part] you cannot make things turn out well in the end.

The FC was motivated more and more by anger--which Sun Tzu noted was a big red flag:

If the general cannot overcome his anger and has his army swarm over a citadel, killing a third of his soldiers, and yet the citadel is still not taken, this is called a disasterous attack.

And:

Therefore there are five traits that are dangerous in generals:

Those who are ready to die can be killed.

Those who are intent on living can be captured.

Those who are quick to anger can be shamed.

Those who are puritanical can be disgraced.

Those who love people can be troubled.

In the meantime, he notes, chaos and anger in your opponent is something you can turn to your advantage:

Using order to deal with the disorderly, using calm to deal with the clamorous, is called mastering the heart.

And:

Use anger to throw them into disarray.

Irrationality in your opponent is therefore a good thing--provided you are rational in responding to it.

And finally:

It may be asked, when a large, well-organized opponent [like the Dominion] is about to come to you, how do you deal with it? The answer is that you first take what like, and they will listen to you.

In other words...the way to defeat them is to break them--and the way to break them is to strike at what they value.
 
Of course, there's an element of dissimilar combat in this case, something ol' Sun wasn't really considering. That is, the opponent isn't quite human...

The Jem'Hadar may be quite capable of fighting efficiently in berserker mode, without leadership or discipline, even at the level of divisions and armies. They won't get fatigued in long campaigns, and don't wish to return home, ever. They already loathe their commanders from the get-go, but they worship their missions nevertheless. And they aren't concerned with loot because only their own can provide the sort of riches they have use for. And in the best spirit of Monty Python, their sole weakness is their willingness to die and their fanatical devotion to the Founders, arguably allowing the enemy to strike at what they value by homing on on the Link - but the resulting berserking won't necessarily debilitate them the way it would a more conventional army.

If the Dominion fully comprehends the qualitative differences between their forces and those of the enemy, and doesn't merely think of the Jem'Hadar as super-duper versions of ordinary troops, it can kill, capture, shame, disgrace and trouble any opposing leader who has read his Sun Tzu...

Timo Saloniemi
 
Well, I would say that Sun did anticipate opponents willing to die: "Those who are ready to die can be killed."

And of course, he also emphasized the value of (when necessary) total annihilation, in the "Fire Attack" chapter. (But only when necessary--he noted that it's better to conquer an enemy without destroying it, and that "siege of a city is done only as a last resort.") And in the final chapter, he emphasized the need for effective intelligence-gathering, particularly double agents.
 
The Jem'Hadar may be quite capable of fighting efficiently in berserker mode, without leadership or discipline, even at the level of divisions and armies
[...]
Timo Saloniemi

No, the jem'hadar can't.
To be more exact, if they were depicted as fighting effectively without rationality and discipline, this would have been a HUGE deus ex machina.

Game theory shows that in any complex activity, reason beats mindless anger anytime - given equal starting positions.
The ones who don't think rationally make mistakes, don't see occasions, don't coordinate, etc.


About the founders - they showed they have no problem with genocide from before the dominion war - 'The quickening' comes to mind.

Sci is confusing rationality with decency and morality. Just because one is rational does NOT make him decent and moral.

The founders, already shown to be paranoid and xenophobic (not so much decent and moral), could have done a LOT more damage with the army at their disposal during the war were they rational, rather than angry/debilitated in any other way.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top