Again, Yevetha, please don't hotlink pics from websites or blogs belonging to other people. If you want to post them as inline images, they really do need to be hosted on your own webspace. (Photobucket, Imageshack and other services have free image-hosting accounts. It'll only take you a minute or two to register for one.)
Come on, those Klingons looked good.
JJ Klingons are not bad, but could be better:
http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Joel-Harlow-21-300x225.jpg
[Images posted inline need to be hosted on your own web space. Image converted to link. - M']
I thought Khan was gonna be the bad guy in Trek 2
Again, Yevetha, please don't hotlink pics from websites or blogs belonging to other people. If you want to post them as inline images, they really do need to be hosted on your own webspace. (Photobucket, Imageshack and other services have free image-hosting accounts. It'll only take you a minute or two to register for one.)
Come on, those Klingons looked good.
JJ Klingons are not bad, but could be better:
http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Joel-Harlow-21-300x225.jpg
[Images posted inline need to be hosted on your own web space. Image converted to link. - M']
Again, Yevetha, please don't hotlink pics from websites or blogs belonging to other people. If you want to post them as inline images, they really do need to be hosted on your own webspace. (Photobucket, Imageshack and other services have free image-hosting accounts. It'll only take you a minute or two to register for one.)Come on, those Klingons looked good.
JJ Klingons are not bad, but could be better:
http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Joel-Harlow-21-300x225.jpg
[Images posted inline need to be hosted on your own web space. Image converted to link. - M']
Sorry, i always forget, why this rule anyway?
As Jarod says, it's about not using someone else's bandwidth to post your pictures. While bandwidth costs aren't what they once were, it's still considered good form and common courtesy to host on your own account any images you post.Again, Yevetha, please don't hotlink pics from websites or blogs belonging to other people. If you want to post them as inline images, they really do need to be hosted on your own webspace. (Photobucket, Imageshack and other services have free image-hosting accounts. It'll only take you a minute or two to register for one.)Come on, those Klingons looked good.
JJ Klingons are not bad, but could be better:
http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Joel-Harlow-21-300x225.jpg
[Images posted inline need to be hosted on your own web space. Image converted to link. - M']
Sorry, i always forget, why this rule anyway?
(emphasis mine)...
Because they don't want you to steal bandwidth, but are okay with you stealing content and hosting it on your own webspace.
How does one tell? He has a limited range of expression.I thought Khan was gonna be the bad guy in Trek 2
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
/Darth Vader in Episode III
And just to further express my point:
![]()
And he means it! He'll go all whiny and emo on you!![]()
Why on Earth would Q be in this movie? He has nothing to do with TOS, and the general moviegoer wouldn't know who he is anyway. That's not how you get Joe Q. Public's ass into a theater seat.
Why on Earth would Q be in this movie? He has nothing to do with TOS, and the general moviegoer wouldn't know who he is anyway. That's not how you get Joe Q. Public's ass into a theater seat.
The general moviegoer didn't know who Khan was, either ... or any other villain in any other movie. Even standalone movies sometimes have a backstory that is being explained during the movie. One wouldn't have to be aware of the entire history of the Q to understand what's going on, but the fans would appreciate such a backstory.
The general moviegoer didn't know who Khan was, either ... or any other villain in any other movie. ...
Exactly. When Wrath of Khan was released, the reviewer from People Magazine wrote that Ricardo Montalban was "hilariously miscast" as Khan. Obviously this reviewer had never seen the TOS episode ...
The general moviegoer didn't know who Khan was, either ... or any other villain in any other movie. ...
Exactly. When Wrath of Khan was released, the reviewer from People Magazine wrote that Ricardo Montalban was "hilariously miscast" as Khan. Obviously this reviewer had never seen the TOS episode ...
Perhaps he meant both times?![]()
Again with the Klingons! I'm so very, very tired of the Klingons. Personally I could do without them in the movie as well.
Yes I share you're mental anguish. I was at the Vegas Con last year and the panel for the new movie said Klingons will be in the movie. I told them that using the Klingons was like beating a dead horse. DS9 used them way too much and ENT portrayal and retcon didn't really add anything to the conversation Trek besides the lack of ridges cause. The guy on the panel agreed with me but he said the Klingons were a "dead horse that hadn't been beaten in a long time".
I'm whatever about it but if they have those stupid Darth Vader masks they had in the concept art and deleted scenes of Trek 09, I'm gonna shit and boo as loud as i can in the theatre.
How does one tell? He has a limited range of expression.I thought Khan was gonna be the bad guy in Trek 2
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
/Darth Vader in Episode III
And just to further express my point:
![]()
And he means it! He'll go all whiny and emo on you!![]()
![]()
Asking "will there be Klingons" is like asking "will there be women".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.