Really? I found New Moon to be more tolerable than Twilight, mostly because Pattinson was absent during most of it. Christ, what an awful actor. And he's fugly, too. Not sure why all the teenage girls get off on him.I actually enjoyed the first one.It's no masterpiece, but at least it had something resembling a decent plot, which is far, far more than can be said for the second one. I hated the second movie.
Really? I found New Moon to be more tolerable than Twilight, mostly because Pattinson was absent during most of it. Christ, what an awful actor. And he's fugly, too. Not sure why all the teenage girls get off on him.I actually enjoyed the first one.It's no masterpiece, but at least it had something resembling a decent plot, which is far, far more than can be said for the second one. I hated the second movie.
![]()
^ But it's full of hot shirtless guys! How could you not like that!
Honestly I think it's Baywatch for teenage girls and gay teens, no plot, but nice to look at.
Really? I found New Moon to be more tolerable than Twilight, mostly because Pattinson was absent during most of it. Christ, what an awful actor. And he's fugly, too. Not sure why all the teenage girls get off on him.I actually enjoyed the first one.It's no masterpiece, but at least it had something resembling a decent plot, which is far, far more than can be said for the second one. I hated the second movie.
![]()
Really? I found New Moon to be more tolerable than Twilight, mostly because Pattinson was absent during most of it. Christ, what an awful actor. And he's fugly, too. Not sure why all the teenage girls get off on him.I actually enjoyed the first one.It's no masterpiece, but at least it had something resembling a decent plot, which is far, far more than can be said for the second one. I hated the second movie.
![]()
But he wears his paints hanging down just above his junk! I mean... they could just slip and then you'd see his milky, cold little sparkly penis!
:swoon:
Really? I found New Moon to be more tolerable than Twilight, mostly because Pattinson was absent during most of it. Christ, what an awful actor. And he's fugly, too. Not sure why all the teenage girls get off on him.I actually enjoyed the first one.It's no masterpiece, but at least it had something resembling a decent plot, which is far, far more than can be said for the second one. I hated the second movie.
![]()
But he wears his paints hanging down just above his junk! I mean... they could just slip and then you'd see his milky, cold little sparkly penis!
:swoon:
I read a review of New Moon recently that stated Rob Pattinson looked like he had dunked his face in a bowl of flour, and had all the screen presence of a used sock!
I read a review of New Moon recently that stated Rob Pattinson looked like he had dunked his face in a bowl of flour, and had all the screen presence of a used sock!
Hell yeah! Ashley Greene needs more screentime, too!If they're going to make a terrible, trashy movie of the Twilight series, full of eye candy for the tween girls; can't they at least give us blokes some of our own eye candy? I mean, Kristen Stewart has a pretty smile, but I feel guilty like I'm looking at someone's younger sister when I look at her. There's always Rachelle Lefevre, I suppose. Oh wait, she ain't in the next one! Bastards!![]()
If someone would do a "fan edit" of the Twilight books (ala The Phantom Edit) and remove all the agnsty teenage emo-ness...
However, I don't really see it happening anytime soon.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.