Since this thread has come back to life---
The conceptualization of the Torres character was nothing but an analogue to a mixed race girl with the crippling problem that her Black half was all cliche. In Faces, which predated Moore's time on Voyager, the Black half and the white half were literally separated. Inevitably, given what modern Klingons are, the white half was the smart one. The heritage episode was not character assassination, it was the same old, same old that Moore chose to do nothing about,even when invited to! My apologies for not reminding you of the earlier episode.
The Romulans simply aren't popular characters, especially with the writers, and play little role in Trek. But this is factually wrong on the Dominion---the Jem'Hadar and the Vortas are notably present many times.
Both Worf and the actual African-American father in Trek, Sisko, are carefully drawn as successful single fathers. Portraying African-American men, overt ones like Sisko or covert ones like Worf, as poor fathers would be using a wholly negative stereotypes. Bad assness and/or sex machines are not wholly negative stereotypes, but they are still stereotypes and really neither desirable, nor good writing. Judgment's Klingons are not stereotypical but Judgment was also a product of the reviled Enterprise. Wasn't this episode particularly despised? The Klingons in Star Trek VI certainly had nothing to do the real modern Klingons, the Ron Moore one. They were thinly disguised Soviets. There was no honor, there was no bluster, there was no honor, there were no big babes with pain sticks.
Nuance is noting that Trek isn't crudely racist, yet there are still difficulties in Trek's use of patronizing or dubious images of African-Americans in portraying Klingons.
The other poster responding to my mention of Moore's Klingons certainly did mean to give them a pass, holding my opinion instead is just nuts, not an obvious conclusion. And I'm pretty sure that everyone who read your posts would think your argument is, reading modern Klingons as basically Black characters is just stupid. I think that's just another way of giving it a pass.
Ronald D. Moore's time on Voyager is irrelevant, since his time on that show was only six episodes. The episode in which Torres tries to change the heritage of her unborn child is nothing short of character assassination--at least that's the way I felt about it when it aired--and I haven't bothered to watch it again since. Moore was long gone by the time it aired, too.
The conceptualization of the Torres character was nothing but an analogue to a mixed race girl with the crippling problem that her Black half was all cliche. In Faces, which predated Moore's time on Voyager, the Black half and the white half were literally separated. Inevitably, given what modern Klingons are, the white half was the smart one. The heritage episode was not character assassination, it was the same old, same old that Moore chose to do nothing about,even when invited to! My apologies for not reminding you of the earlier episode.
The fact that the Klingon's "Empire" is pretty much empty is the same flaw that afflicts the "Dominion" and the Romulan "Empire." It's a conceptual problem rooted in budgetary limitations.
The Romulans simply aren't popular characters, especially with the writers, and play little role in Trek. But this is factually wrong on the Dominion---the Jem'Hadar and the Vortas are notably present many times.
Nuance would be to move on past the generalities being drawn and to pay attention to specifics: Worf's characterization as a successful single father, episodes like "Judgment" (ENT) which illustrate complexities and differences in Klingon culture, and Star Trek VI's clever deconstruction of notions of Klingon barbarism.
Both Worf and the actual African-American father in Trek, Sisko, are carefully drawn as successful single fathers. Portraying African-American men, overt ones like Sisko or covert ones like Worf, as poor fathers would be using a wholly negative stereotypes. Bad assness and/or sex machines are not wholly negative stereotypes, but they are still stereotypes and really neither desirable, nor good writing. Judgment's Klingons are not stereotypical but Judgment was also a product of the reviled Enterprise. Wasn't this episode particularly despised? The Klingons in Star Trek VI certainly had nothing to do the real modern Klingons, the Ron Moore one. They were thinly disguised Soviets. There was no honor, there was no bluster, there was no honor, there were no big babes with pain sticks.
Nuance is noting that Trek isn't crudely racist, yet there are still difficulties in Trek's use of patronizing or dubious images of African-Americans in portraying Klingons.
All of which is not to give the "obvious" a pass, but to acknowledge the complexity of the show.
The other poster responding to my mention of Moore's Klingons certainly did mean to give them a pass, holding my opinion instead is just nuts, not an obvious conclusion. And I'm pretty sure that everyone who read your posts would think your argument is, reading modern Klingons as basically Black characters is just stupid. I think that's just another way of giving it a pass.