Are you, or have you ever been related to a poster that goes by the name of RobertScorpio?
Nope....doesn't ring a bell
Include William Shatner in Star Trek XI Petition
- Thread starter destroyer1138
- Start date
Nope....doesn't ring a bell
well lucas finances his own films so i suspect he can do just about what he wants to do.
while a studio might frown on the $$ to get together several actors, rebuild sets ect...
about the only filming that takes place once primary filming has stopped is some clean up stuff done by second unit.
while a studio might frown on the $$ to get together several actors, rebuild sets ect...
about the only filming that takes place once primary filming has stopped is some clean up stuff done by second unit.
TrekMovie is tolerant of all points of view. However due to some fervent 'BBKers' we had to begin to enforce a policy of 'no agenda posters' as in those whose sole purpose is to advocate one thing or another and solely post about it and attempt to divert threads into 'their issue' whatever that issue is. In my opinion the more fervent BBKers actually turned many of fans against their cause due to some of their tactics, accusations, and general attitude. This kind of backlash is evident in this thread as well. Not all those who advocate Shatner are problematic, but a few bad apples turned off a lot of the average Trekkies.
As for this petition, it would have helped to name all the producers and spell the names of those producers correctly.
Superman
Fleet Captain
Grow a pair or leave! This place gets rough sometimes and you just got your baptism by fire. You know what they say about opinions. This place is no different...You know what, you 6 guys aren't the fan base. I am so sorry that I offended your sensibilties. Geez get over yourselves. Thanks for the big welcome to the foruims!
...and, welcome aboard.
Finishing your statement about opinions: it has to do with assholes?
Is that really what you want to be?
Consider it.
\S/
Superman, this post might have carried somewhat more credibility had it been worded differently and had it not had this puerile thing
attached to the bottom of it, and this:
was completely unnecessary and treads closer to the line than I really want to see here. As they stand, you didn't do anyone any favors with these two gems, least of all yourself.
Is that really what you wanted?
Nimoy is in it because he is a major part of the story. If Shatner were to be shoved in at the last second, it wouldn't effect or help the story in any way. I say leave him out.
I would put Kirk in Star Trek:XII IF there is a solid need to, and of course if Star Trek: XI does well.
Wow, here we go: typical Trek BBS nerds attacking a new guy for wanting Shat in the film and creating a petition.
How charming. Many of you need to grow the fuck up and get over yourselves.
\S/
Superman
Behave yourself. It's just a goddamn TV show!
Blasphemy will NOT be tolerated on this board! [Prays to the Great Bird of the Galaxy to forgive Fergy and spare his wayward soul...]Wow, here we go: typical Trek BBS nerds attacking a new guy for wanting Shat in the film and creating a petition.
How charming. Many of you need to grow the fuck up and get over yourselves.
\S/
Superman
Behave yourself. It's just a goddamn TV show!
well they've already got some hokey plot with old spock teaming up with young spock so they might as well throw Shatner in
Shatner should do a song about not being in the movie, and bust all over Nimoy in it, a la east-west coast rappers.
Well, I'm signature no. 11. I doubt if this will ever happen, but at least I can sleep tonight knowing I did my part. 
The Shat must be respected!
The Shat must be respected!
YOU DON'T KNOW THAT! For all you know it's old Spock AGAINST young Spock!
So there.
And all.
<phew...I need a juicebox!>
$50 quatllons on Young Spock.
*Gets popcorn*
YOU DON'T KNOW THAT! For all you know it's old Spock AGAINST young Spock!
OOH!
Spock on Spock Slash!
Similar threads
