Not seeing the issue.(I hate that the renaming is basically necessary now. In my single digits, I was a big fan of The Shazam/Isis Hour.)
Not seeing the issue.(I hate that the renaming is basically necessary now. In my single digits, I was a big fan of The Shazam/Isis Hour.)
You know how the sw*stika was long a symbol of divinity and spiritualism, and in some traditions still is, but generally now represents something much different and evil in the West?Not seeing the issue.
I don’t know. A sixties period piece might work.
I find that to be over correction. Isis is not ISIS.You know how the sw*stika was long a symbol of divinity and spiritualism, and in some traditions still is, but generally now represents something much different and evil in the West?
It’s kind of like that, I think.
I dunno, might be fun to have it take place over the past 60 years starting with the 60's and work real world events into it. Recontextualizing them with Trek backdrops. Maybe show histories as they "really would have gone" if not for our heroes doing their thing. If they really want to swing for the fences, maybe show some things we don't like about today as a result of failures and/or complications of their missions.But it's not necessary. The original concept was for a show set during the present-day. Certainly, Roddenberry didn't conceive of it as a period piece, back in the sixties.
Nah, not me. At least not first run. I’d probably binge them. Or that’s what I’d do if not for the weekly Trek zoom in another thread. It's fun talking with other Trek fans even if it’s not about something I’m in love with, and hearing everyone’s different opinions.id definley watch the sequel to strange new worlds
which would have been in a way the streaming rebooted verison of star trek the original series
In the final year or so of Trek's current streaming era, would you have watched any of the planned and canned show concepts?
"Assignment: Earth" was an episode that I enjoyed at the time and I would certainly have watched a series about Gary Seven, Isis and Roberta. (Liked Assignment: Eternity by our very own member, Greg Cox, and the various short stories in the Strange New Worlds anthologies too).

I agree. This is why I was hoping that Legacy would happen. I've been waiting for an Enterprise based series that would take place post Voyager and Picard S3 is the closest we got.Nah, not me. At least not first run. I’d probably binge them. Or that’s what I’d do if not for the weekly Trek zoom in another thread. It's fun talking with other Trek fans even if it’s not about something I’m in love with, and hearing everyone’s different opinions.
What I’d really love is an entirely new crew on an entirely new ship with entirely new aliens, probably sometime in the 25 the century. Basically, what TNG did after TOS. Push us into the future, but not so far where it’s basically pure fantasy à la the 32nd century. We can have older species in there of course, but either as background or in a new context (Klingons as friends vs the enemies they were), or expanding on ones we’ve only seen in the background and that you could go far with.
Dear lord YES!!!!!! That is so essential to the franchise and its amazing to me how this often gets missed. If I want post apocalyptic wasteland I'd watch the Walking Dead or Mad Max.Most importantly, give me a vision of the future that feels as absolutely real as you can make it, and that is one I'd want to visit and dream about. Who tf wants to live in a post-apocalyptic wasteland? That’s swell in a one-off movie or book or what have you, but Trek is sci-fi’s “flagship” aspirational property: let’s fly.
Most importantly, give me a vision of the future that feels as absolutely real as you can make it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.