It was a bit joyless at first.Fair enough, but you appeared to be saying that the show was entirely joyless, which i found astonishing.
It was a bit joyless at first.Fair enough, but you appeared to be saying that the show was entirely joyless, which i found astonishing.
As for a dying fanbase, the fanbase of TNG, DS9 and VOY aren't that old.
Wouldn't it be nice if Star trek could be an alternative to that for the newer generation.
C-Spock shoulder-stimulant, stat.

Typically, media aims for audiences 18-35. I was 7 when TNG premiered in 1987. I am now 46. I am outside of what media aims for. I am well aware of that. Fans of the TNG era are now largely past that 18-35 range. Those who were 35 at the start of TNG are now in their 70s. So for those who were present for the entirety of the TNG era they would be between their mid 40s and up.
Just to keep in mind.
I see both Prodigy and SFA as good jumping on points for the newer generation. Both extremely optimistic and geared largely towards younger audiences. And no need to reply and say you disagree with me here. I am well aware.
Please no if it is a joyless experience with a wooden main character.
While not all subscribers watch either show, it’s hard to get close to the numbers you want them to reach without increasing their subscriber count.
Trek has always been more niche than Wars, regardless of the quality of the story.
I do not find Cassian an enjoyable main character.
I still can't figure out why this isn't already the case - network shows seem to annihilate streaming shows in viewership (even on streaming services - on P+ network procedurals and old sitcoms are reigning, and I've read that TOS is ahead of SNW and SFA).Guess it's better for Trek to be on broadcast or cable TV then, if we want it to be competitive with shows like Andor.
And...
I always recommend TOS first to younger people. The reason?? I want them to see how it all started. Some find it boring. Which I understand. It's tough for it to compete with higher production shows. Then I say Any order after TOS. Though production order would be preferable.
Sooo... popularity is fine even if it's an unlikable character?Irrelevant. My point was to the popularity of the show. I want commenting on the story telling
From this data we can see that all franchises hit a peak around year 10 and lose their viewers' enthusiasm around their 15th year due to over familiarity... except for James Bond, which released The Spy Who Loved Me and was doing fine.
First, who gets to define what one means by “former glory?”
Which means that the audiences simply won’t be as large. Though I’m betting that you knew that…
Sooo... popularity is fine even if it's an unlikable character?
I still can't figure out why this isn't already the case - network shows seem to annihilate streaming shows in viewership (even on streaming services - on P+ network procedurals and old sitcoms are reigning, and I've read that TOS is ahead of SNW and SFA).
Alright, so CanadaNo matter which show I picked someone would have come up with this same logical fallacy argument. My focus was that numbers are the only steady way we have to measure the popularity (and therefore success) of the streaming series in question

I feel like if someone was already into Rogue One that was the hook.The bigger question is how do you do the appeal to that broad audience? The risk of Andor is that many Star Wars fans didn't enjoy it because it was slow and plodding at first. It lacked a hook like some are used to.
What age group are you referring to?Which is why I suggest Prodigy or SFA. TOS is great, but hard for younger viewers.
What age group are you referring to?
I'm genuinely curious, because I haven't watched either show and am still figuring out if I want to. (I probably will, once I get a break from teaching.)
In your previous post, you mentioned the 18-35 demographic, which is quite a wide range, in my opinion. Judging strictly from the premises of these shows, I'd say both seem more geared toward viewers under 25. Wouldn't SNW be a better fit for the older half of that demographic?
I agree that TOS can be a little challenging for many even in that age category (depending on their general background, of course). But I also think a lot of people over 25 wouldn't find series about teenagers and cadets all that enticing.
If that were entirely true, I wouldn't have to sit through so many ads during Starfleet Academy.Except Paramount Plus doesn't care about advertisers -- the demographic they care about is people who subscribe to it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.