To be fair, the comics are filling in world building that the writers of the show didn't fill in themselves. Or alternatively, the comic writer is using a show bible for reference I suppose.
^^This.
As much as a few rare comics like the Lower Decks ones can be good, they're very much not canon for good reasons.
I'll take minor issue with this issue, because I think your characterization of the ending is off.My biggest issue with this episode is probably the unearned ending.
They don't get "horribly" pranked. The prank is actually very mild.Basically, the show is all about the prank war that is straight from Revenge of the Nerds or Animal House and it ends just like those other college movies where the jocks get horribly pranked in return. Audrey the Venus Flytrap has ruined their frathouse.
What Ake actually says is that she prompted the Starfleet kids to practice patience, develop a real strategy and practice the empathy needed to understand an opponent "so that you can disarm them."No, instead, Chancellor Ake talks about how they won the conflict by empathy and understanding which ABSOLUTELY THEY DID NOT DO.
This also did not happen. There is no indication that the plant destroys anything or is dangerous in any other way. It's just inconvenient.They ended the conflict by destroying a massive amount of Starfleet propery.
Sure they are... And that's why the comic writer thinks Transwarp has years of time dilation...To be fair, the comics are filling in world building that the writers of the show didn't fill in themselves. Or alternatively, the comic writer is using a show bible for reference I suppose.
No indication other then it slamming people up against walls you mean.This also did not happen. There is no indication that the plant destroys anything or is dangerous in any other way. It's just inconvenient.
I think we can profitably restrain our level of fuss-budgetry over the one kid who experiences a minor pratfall, yes. Literally every other indicator is that the plants are not dangerous or harmful, just inconvenient.No indication other then it slamming people up against walls you mean.
Sure they are... And that's why the comic writer thinks Transwarp has years of time dilation...
Yes... But we know that's not true from the times we've been on Born ships while they were traveling via Transwarp...Issue #4 at least attempts to explain this in that Federation drives move ships through space and the vessels are protected from time dilation (presumably the concept that warp drive folds space), whereas the Borg drive is a literal FTL drive with the ensuing dilation.
Again - writers are making this show for contemporary audiences, so they wrote a gesture that could be understandable for someone watching today.The Romulan giving the fuck-off gesture made me laugh but at the same time it is a huge failure of imagination on the part of the writers to just have every character in their sci-fi comedy act like an American teenager from 2026 (or what a middle-aged writer assumes a teenager acts like in 2026, which ends up being an unholy amalgamation of 80s jock characters mixed with TikTok slang).
Again - writers are making this show for contemporary audiences, so they wrote a gesture that could be understandable for someone watching today.
Star Trek is a TV show just like any other. Characters should be relatable and/or understandable.
Welcome to Star Trek. Most people aren't gonna get a reference from fictional "cultures and artistic productions." That's why we get Opera, Sherlock Holmes, Pulp Detectives and Shakespeare. OTH, we have Mariner's Sarcastic Vulcan Salute. But that's a bit "inside baseball".To be semi-series, and I know it's a TV show for Americans so it is what it is, but a human hegemonic future is kind of depressing because it means in a galaxy full of infinite cultures and artistic production, they chose 20th century American culture to consume.
Isolationist.I suppose xenophobic in terms of not wanting any outsiders approaching the planet, not necessarily racist.
As Lower Decks showed, those things can be done at the same time so it's not taking up any extra storyline time.What would be the point of creating a new gesture that they then have to take up valuable storytime to explain.
The Vulcan Salute is part of contemporary pop culture. It requires no explanation, especially in a Star Trek show.As Lower Decks showed, those things can be done at the same time so it's not taking up any extra storyline time.
Explaining its Jewish origins takes a little more time.The Vulcan Salute is part of contemporary pop culture. It requires no explanation, especially in a Star Trek show.
It shouldn't, but I was at least entertaining the general premise of their objection.The Vulcan Salute is part of contemporary pop culture. It requires no explanation, especially in a Star Trek show.
I think that's enormously underrating the ability of viewers to engage with sci-fi. The prank itself involved a completely fantastical concept (transporters), which obviously doesn't make it less comprehensible/relatable to viewers; there's no reason that character dialogue and gestures can't be similarly rooted in the show's fictional universe, and it'd probably be funnier if they were.Again - writers are making this show for contemporary audiences, so they wrote a gesture that could be understandable for someone watching today.
Star Trek is a TV show just like any other. Characters should be relatable and/or understandable.
Well, we know the Academy gyms in Prodigy were holodecks, so it wasn't really that nothing changed for 1200 years so much as that they went back to the 1200 year old design for reasons.Just started watching it. I see nithimg has changed for gyms in 1200 years. Even the construction looks like a 20th/21st century gym
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.