At the end of the day all that really matters is the views ( I think)Ah the Star Trek fanbase, where else can so many disparate truths exist
At the end of the day all that really matters is the views ( I think)Ah the Star Trek fanbase, where else can so many disparate truths exist
here is what i think the new star trek intro would go
space the first frontier these are the new students of the starfleet academy to seek out training from lives to civilazations and boldy go where no species has gone before
My condolences.I recently watched close to 20 episodes of Voyager for a project that I'm working on, and then I watched the Section 31 movie afterwards as a palate cleanser.
Ah the Star Trek fanbase, where else can so many disparate truths exist
They did! The Discovery writers just forgot those things.Because ill give it a chance. You never know. But im really picky especially when it comes to how the tech is portrayed. From what im seeing things havent changed a whole lot in 900 years. They still havent replaced warp engines and still using starship to traverse the galaxy. You would think they would have something new after 9 centuries. They never even got a spore drive type tech or at least something that can move the ship long distances in seconds instead of days.
Forgetting about a technology? Sounds like Star Trek to me!They did! The Discovery writers just forgot those things.
Or possibly those technologies were black boxed by whatever secretive group in the White Room is controlling the Federation from the shadows.
Exactly. But its still a huge advance in technology. Even far beyond what they had in tng. They should not have written it as a 23rd century tech. They could easily made discovery a normal starship with just a warp drive, have them leap into the 32nd century abd discover that warp drive no longer existed and the spore drive was the new way that stsrfleet powered their stsrships. Instead it was written as the discovery with a spore drive travels into the 32nd century and for some reason the spore drive is far advanced to stsrfleets engines. 32nd century starships still can't transport instantaneously to a location they still need to travel via warp speed. Burnham even shows iff with the spore drive with her attitude of "you think our ship is primitiv? Watch this". The thing is shes right. They have nothing in the 32nd century earth ships to rival her spore drive.
Its just really bad writing.
They did! The Discovery writers just forgot those things.
Or possibly those technologies were black boxed by whatever secretive group in the White Room is controlling the Federation from the shadows.
At the end of the day all that really matters is the views ( I think)
That's literally Star Trek. Warp 13? Forgotten. Transwarp? Forgotten? Time travel is easy? Eh, mixed remembrances. Transporter to cure aging? Passe'. Genesis device? Nah. Androids? Nope, Data's really the only one.I can't believe they "black boxed" tech for 10 centuries. Voyager met one species that had a transporter that could move people or objects thousands of light years. Even roddenberry spoke of star trek tech advancing beyond warp drive. Even the personal transporters the writers dialed back. First they were actual transporters that were self contained. The writers felt it made things to easy so they made it where the badge had to be linked to the ship transporter to work. Data came up with it 1000 years before. If they felt things woukd get too easy they shouldn't gave moved things 1000 years ahead.

Involved a rejiggering of the warp scale.Warp 13?
Failed.Transwarp?
Is actively being covered up by Daniel's conspiracy.Time travel is easy?
Was never really a thing.Transporter to cure aging?
Ended up being mass produced and used for Terraforming according to Lower Decks.Genesis device?
Also ended up being mass produced.Androids? Nope, Data's really the only one.
On screen evidence?Involved a rejiggering of the warp scale.
Evidence?Failed.
Oh, ok. Missed the memo, I guess...Is actively being covered up by Daniel's conspiracy.
So Pulaski died?Was never really a thing.
Well, finally, one that actually has a happy ending for Trek tech.Ended up being mass produced and used for Terraforming according to Lower Decks.
Data was treated as supremely unique, as if the Federation had never seen an android before.Also ended up being mass produced.
One could argue the change in warp scale from TOS to TNG was due to the Excelsior. What was considered transwarp by TOS standards became regular warp for the TNG era.Them dropping the spore drive stuff I don't think is a big deal. Kind of like how Transwarp space travel I guess died due to Scotty fiddling with it on the Excelsior in The Search for Spock."
Voyager where they stated that going warp 10 is infinite velocity.On screen evidence?
There was a commemorative plaque about it in Picard.Evidence?
No, that wasn't actual aging.So Pulaski died?
And he was, then the Federation mass produced them.Data was treated as supremely unique, as if the Federation had never seen an android before.
That's literally Star Trek. Warp 13? Forgotten. Transwarp? Forgotten? Time travel is easy? Eh, mixed remembrances. Transporter to cure aging? Passe'. Genesis device? Nah. Androids? Nope, Data's really the only one.
Star Trek has it's own Raiders of the Lost Ark warehouse being overseen by top men. When Old Trek does it it's "timely." When new Trek forgets something its "bad writing."![]()
One could argue the change in warp scale from TOS to TNG was due to the Excelsior. What was considered transwarp by TOS standards became regular warp for the TNG era.
Star trek 5?Didn't the Enterprise go both outside and to the center of the galaxy like...really, really fast? Where'd that tech go?
At least Kurtzman, being the skilled writer he is, explained his tech discrepancies.
I thought 90s trek was slower than TOS, measured by distance traveled. I have heard that argued a few times.One could argue the change in warp scale from TOS to TNG was due to the Excelsior. What was considered transwarp by TOS standards became regular warp for the TNG era.
Voyager's faultDidn't the Enterprise go both outside and to the center of the galaxy like...really, really fast? Where'd that tech go?
Twice:Didn't the Enterprise go both outside and to the center of the galaxy like...really, really fast? Where'd that tech go?
At least Kurtzman, being the skilled writer he is, explained his tech discrepancies.
Which is inconsistent with TNG and TOS.Voyager where they stated that going warp 10 is infinite velocity.
So none that is referenced.There was a commemorative plaque about it in Picard.
How so? It was a disease? Aging is also a progress degradation of genetic changes, as referenced in the episode. So why couldn't it be used again?No, that wasn't actual aging.
But he wasn't. The Old Ones on Exo III, the androids on Mudd's planet, various automatons on the Shore Leave planet, Flint's work, Sargon's work, etc. Yet, TNG talks as though androids are a new thing.And he was, then the Federation mass produced them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.