Was it actually a good thing, including for Star Trek VI as film and for the rest of the cast also, that George Takei insisted on Sulu having become a captain by then?
In particular a lot of people complain about a lot more of the TNG era cast should have moved on, left the ship/advanced in careers earlier, with the original cast we did get that not from writers particularly wanting to, thinking that was good but actor wanting. insisting on it. Did that help at least in part to show, convince that a lot of time had passed and era had passed, was ending?
And also in the film Chekov has a decent if pretty goofy/love it or hate it role but would it have been less effective, felt pretty minimal if Chekov's material had somehow been split between Sulu and Chekov?
It's also kind of interesting comparison in that with the original cast we generally just don't expect the smaller 4 to have, get a lot of material and give a lot of contributions, just learning/assuming Scotty is going to retire and Uhura being involved with 2 or 3 moments feels like decent size roles for them.
In particular a lot of people complain about a lot more of the TNG era cast should have moved on, left the ship/advanced in careers earlier, with the original cast we did get that not from writers particularly wanting to, thinking that was good but actor wanting. insisting on it. Did that help at least in part to show, convince that a lot of time had passed and era had passed, was ending?
And also in the film Chekov has a decent if pretty goofy/love it or hate it role but would it have been less effective, felt pretty minimal if Chekov's material had somehow been split between Sulu and Chekov?
It's also kind of interesting comparison in that with the original cast we generally just don't expect the smaller 4 to have, get a lot of material and give a lot of contributions, just learning/assuming Scotty is going to retire and Uhura being involved with 2 or 3 moments feels like decent size roles for them.