But remember:Remember, the hapless Starfleet security guard in "Friday's Child(TOS)" pulled his phaser the very moment Kras the Klingon stepped out from behind the Capellan. It's standard Starfleet policy.
Kirk: "He was young, and INEXPERENCED!"

But remember:Remember, the hapless Starfleet security guard in "Friday's Child(TOS)" pulled his phaser the very moment Kras the Klingon stepped out from behind the Capellan. It's standard Starfleet policy.
True that.People aren't questioning that she fired, but rather why the writers chose to have the entire security team's phasers set to kill. Obviously La'an panic-firing wouldn't have mattered if the phasers were on stun, as is often shown to be standard procedure (and this mission is a textbook example of why).
The answer is that the writers really wanted the Gorn to die by La'an's hand because a) it's a dramatic ending and b) so the Metron could sneer at humans for being violent and thus get the "we hope somebody passes our test in the future, wink wink" reference to Arena in there.
I can't wait for that day .Besides, what about when no Trek is being made? What will folks complain about then?
Yes, master.Right now we question it because anytime someone kills someone we should.
Sounds like it. More than that, it's far closer to fitting with a TOS or even early TNG ethos in that people react first, including the security officer in Friday's Child, Yar in Encounter at Farpoint, among others. And then there's not s clear or good answer. There's questions of what was done. It invites audience engagement rather than "the main characters are always right."True. I'd call it an error in judgment, though.
Then why was he on an Enterprise landing party visiting a pre-industrial warrior society armed with spear and arrow weapons? Cool story, Kirk. You're not helping. At all.But remember:
Kirk: "He was young, and INEXPERENCED!"
![]()
Red Shirt Lottery. Even when you win, you lose.Then why was he on an Enterprise landing party visiting a pre-industrial warrior society armed with spear and arrow weapons? Cool story, Kirk. You're not helping. At all.
What? Gotta train them sometime - how else you gonna tell if they're dumb as a rock?Then why was he on an Enterprise landing party visiting a pre-industrial warrior society armed with spear and arrow weapons? Cool story, Kirk. You're not helping. At all.
Instead, it would just suck.If he did do SNW would not have disrespected TOS.
The Metrons were in control of everything in Their TERRARIUM.Technically, Scotty rigged a special sensor box that could detect Gorn. Had the Enterprise detected the Gorn then why were La'an and her security team surprised to see her? Seems that Starfleet only selectively detects the presence of Gorn with sensors. The special environment on the surface may have prevented such a scan. They only knew Erica was down there.
This might be the first SNW episode where the name is written on the shuttle. Or at least legible
![]()
Jörg Hillebrand (@gaghyogi49.bsky.social)
We get some really good shots of the Stamets-type shuttle Archimedes (NCC-1701/8) in #StarTrekSNW's "Terrarium". I believe this is also the first time that the shuttle's name at the front of the shuttle is legible on the show.bsky.app
I can only find it on concept art on Google
Comparing the production values of late '70s sci-fi cinema to late 60s sci-fi television isn’t just unfair, it’s laughable.Shows like Alien Earth got the look of the original alien world down correctly. Same with star wars.
Comparing the production values of late '70s sci-fi cinema to late 60s sci-fi television isn’t just unfair, it’s laughable.
The Enterprise bridge looked fantastic in 66 and is a iconic set.
It looked good at the time, it doesn't now.Yeah and it still.looks great. Why don't you explain why it doesn't.
If I felt pedantic then I'd note that TMP and TNG feel nearly disconnected from TOS from a tech standpoint. TOS always stands out from any other Trek production. And, now, well, it feels less futuristic.Yeah, I love visual continuity but there's a fine line between concern and being a whiny pedant.
The future ain't what it used to beIf I felt pedantic then I'd note that TMP and TNG feel nearly disconnected from TOS from a tech standpoint. TOS always stands out from any other Trek production. And, now, well, it feels less futuristic.
Because it looks like an aged television set from 1966 and not a good visual representation of the future, especially when the NX-01 now exists within the franchise.Yeah and it still.looks great. Why don't you explain why it doesn't.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.