Not the only oneIs there a typo in Data's rank or I'm seeing things? It's not M in the middle of his rank, isn't it?
Multiple Lt. Commanders on there are spelled that way. Not all though.
Not the only oneIs there a typo in Data's rank or I'm seeing things? It's not M in the middle of his rank, isn't it?
Yes we do, the creators have said it is.We have no idea if that's true or not
Ignoring it is too easy.It never ceases to amuse me the straws that the anti-Discovery crowd will grasp at to justify their lame alternate universe theories.
No, a member of the production crew who didn't have the ability to set paramount policy said something like that. And they can be overridden at any time by the member of another production who doesn't like something Discovery has done. (See Lower Decks.)Yes we do, the creators have said it is.
Discovery was a prequel before season 3, every event that happened in that show already happened from the perspective of TOS and the later series, so any changes made to the timeline during the first 2 seasons created the timeline as seen in TOS.
They control the lore, so they do have a say.No, a member of the production crew who didn't have the ability to set paramount policy said something like that.
Neither show did that.I'd also remind you here that both Prodigy and Lower Decks consider the "Prime Timeline" to be down to personal opinion.
Is it not Zoe Steiner's character, Cadet Sadal?
That's not how it works.We have no idea if that's true or not due to all the timeline changes Gabrielle Burnham caused.
You may be right. Looking at the trailer, there seem to be at least a few shots of her getting romantic with Caleb.
Still, she's very much not featured in the trailer. The camera doesn't linger on her. And it's strange, if she's one of the six main cadets, we haven't gotten a bio sheet for her as well.
This could go one of two different ways. Maybe she's not in the first episode, only becoming a cadet a bit later?
Conversely, maybe Steiner's character isn't actually a main because she dies early on? Though if that were the case, I would expect the trailer to try and fake us out and think she was a main, rather than the inverse.
Neither show did that.
Well yes, from the perspective of people from another universe of course they'd see theirs as 'Prime'.In the first episode of the 5th season, the crew of the alternate Cerritos considered their universe to be the 'prime' one. I took that to mean that 'prime' is really just a buzzword these days that has very little meaning to anyone who isn't a member of the TrekBBS.
Well yes, from the perspective of people from another universe of course they'd see theirs as 'Prime'.
That's a joke going back decades in other franchises with multiverses.
Seven of Nine did have a beautiful episode with Kes, these scenes between Kes and Seven are probably some of the most important character interactions in modern Star Trek if you think about it?
They were going to fire Garrett Wang until he made the People's Most Sexiest. I never have heard Lien having issues during filming.Very VERY few people remember who Kes is. Compounded with the fact that Jennifer Lien was written out of the show because personal issues kept affecting her performance, Paramount isn't going to spend a dime to bring her back.
Seven of Nine did have a beautiful episode with Kes, these scenes between Kes and Seven are probably some of the most important character interactions in modern Star Trek if you think about it?
Not to mention that she apparently got arrested again very recently.Very VERY few people remember who Kes is. Compounded with the fact that Jennifer Lien was written out of the show because personal issues kept affecting her performance, Paramount isn't going to spend a dime to bring her back.
I never have heard Lien having issues during filming.
They were going to fire Garrett Wang until he made the People's Most Sexiest. I never have heard Lien having issues during filming.
The executive producer of all shows in fact does have the authority to say what timeline it’s taking place in, and no feeble attempt at moving goalposts will change that.No, a member of the production crew who didn't have the ability to set paramount policy said something like that.
The executive producer of all shows in fact does have the authority to say what timeline it’s taking place in, and no feeble attempt at moving goalposts will change that.
Paramount owns the property. Kurtzman has a contract to produce the property exclusively through Paramount. Therefore, it is Prime timeline because he’s the one in charge.
Simple as that. You make not like it, but facts have no bearing on your feelings.
Yeah, and? The point was clearly made that there is no real 'prime' universe if everyone thinks their version of it is the 'correct' one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.