I'm just glad the TNG crew survived. When it was first announced that they'd be back, you'd be forgiven for thinking that half wouldn't make it to the end. Probably from brutal eyeball torture.
Alex Kurtzman on streaming movies and the future of Trek
- Thread starter Danja
- Start date
Nah, that's for one offs and reoccurrings.
yes, my first thought when he said he was bringing them all back , was terror. I was sure they were going to kill someone off
Nonsense. They were very negative of Section 31. And has it occurred to you that they may have actually liked the stuff that they say they liked? They're just not toxic like so much of YouTube.
Dude, if you really don't like it, don't watch it, you're acting like a 16-year-old teenager.
There are very few Star Trek fans in Turkey. There is almost no content producer on YouTube. Some watch old and new Treks, there are YouTubers who don't like new Treks but they don't even talk about it and most of them don't even watch new work as a reaction.
Last edited:
I genuinely don't understand the thinking here. Even if Paramount was to do this, what makes you think that the 'execs' are going start the franchise over in a way that pleases you? If anything evidence would suggest that they would double down on making trek that appeals to a mass audience instead of fans such as yourself.
There is no way to appeal to fans who view it through rise tinted glasses. The show doesn't exist.
"Be careful what you wish for..."
It seems like insanely backwards logic to think that studio execs would ever release a movie wanting it to fail for any reason. As for the rest... I genuinely shudder to think.
This feels like a broken record, honestly. If "X" happens, maybe "Y" will?! Been reading drivel like this since I was 8 years old, which is 45 years ago.
Their only concern is how quickly can they recoup their investment in any given project. There are no stakes or anger that are going to change anything if the product is hitting revenue projections. YouTuber's are sour on current Trek because that is what generates clicks and views. I'm betting that many of the same folks who are spewing shit also privately enjoy the shows. Let that sink in...
There was Section 31 outrage? Other than the usual outrage merchants of course.
It was too generic to cause any particular outrage. Which is the saddest thing of all. Something so bad that has zero redeeming value even as comedy.
Money talks.
That is all. All the outrage click bait will not change that. Ignoring it would do more.
I think that show is called "Strange New Worlds". See also: "Lower Decks" and "Prodigy." No genocidal Space CIA there.
I'm sure the Academy show is just code for Space CIA.
Two of those were cancelled and one was shelved for a year because he needed to work on his vanity projects.
For those of you who still might think that Trek Culture won't be too negative on Section 31 because they're afraid of losing "access", I give you exhibit B.
Last edited:
Pretty sure SNW rolls along without Kurtzman. He's not all that involved with the day to day. What ever "delays" it might have would not be caused by a "vanity project."
Similar threads
