Just finished reading the entirety of the article and...it's fucking awful.
Even though I first heard about some of the horrific sexual assault accusations against Neil Gaiman last July (courtesy of the aforementioned news story regarding two of them made on a podcast), I was not even remotely prepared for the vileness of the detailed stories about Gaiman's decades-long graphic behavior.
As a massive fan of his storytelling, I didn't want to believe what I first read last summer and did what many of us shouldn't have done but did anyways: Waited to see while "processing" this news.
But after reading Lila Shapiro's extensive research, the truth is undeniable. The isolated and repeated, yet eerily similar claims clearly demonstrate Gaiman's reprehensible conduct has been going on and kept quiet for a very long time.
There can and should be a discussion about separating an artist from their art (or even reflecting as noted by Shapiro repeatedly), but right now, the focus must remain on the behavior of the abuser and empathy for the victims.
As difficult as it was at times to read certain portions of the article, I forced myself to read all of it because I find it vitally important to believe women and to always listen to them. I fully understand why many people cannot (and should not) read this article, but I greatly urge everyone who can (especially Gaiman's fans) to read all of it.
(On a side note, I never knew about Gaiman's Scientology upbringing and his own victimhood until this article, but it doesn't remotely excuse him for his actions)