It is too bad.
Means having to focus on other characters.
No, I'm making an observation. I have seen the comments about the lack of focus. I don't share it, but also am a person who is more interested in Burnham than most others. So, while I get your comment, I don't share it.Are you being facetious? Because one of the ongoing complaints this season has been that there ISN'T much focus on other characters.
Pretty sure that thread was started by a bitter Discovery fan getting their own back.
Either way having a problem with Discovery being a Burnham show is pointless because it's about the only thing in the show the production team have been steadfast and certain about. They have never claimed it would be anything else.
No, I'm making an observation. I have seen the comments about the lack of focus. I don't share it, but also am a person who is more interested in Burnham than most others. So, while I get your comment, I don't share it.
But that wasn't known. So, to my mind, these complaints are amounting to "I wish the show were completely redone to my satisfaction." Which, while valid, is not actually enjoying the show, nor recognizing the limits put on it, either due to contracts, or the decision to end, or focusing on non preferred characters.Yeah, I DO like Burnham.
But, since we're probably never going to see these other characters again, I would have liked a chance to get to know them better as well.
But that wasn't known. So, to my mind, these complaints are amounting to "I wish the show were completely redone to my satisfaction." Which, while valid, is not actually enjoying the show, nor recognizing the limits put on it, either due to contracts, or the decision to end, or focusing on non preferred characters.
At this point, it feels like people should just rip Discovery down and build up, write up, their own preferred model.
I don't recommend that.I'm a writer, and a creative writing teacher, so when I see things like this, I want to pull my hair out.
I'm a little more standoffish on this for a couple of reasons. One, I had that burned out of me majorly with Voyager. Voyager was promoted heavily as one thing, and ended up something else. I had kid's magazines on Voyager and the different characters (even as a young teen) and was all in. And it left such a sour taste because I went all in.I get pissed because Discovery could have been SO MUCH BETTER.
Damn straight!Michael Burham is the James T. Kirk of Discovery. She is supposed to be. Okay? But unlike Kirk in TOS we got to follow along from the beginning of her hero's journey. And Labyrinths showed that, like many of us, she's still on it.
I suspect that some genuinely do (I know I enjoy random people, like Rhys and Bryce) but I also am just as concerned that it's because there is zero interest in the lead character so any other character would be preferred, and it doesn't matter who.I haven't seen any requests for WAY more stories focused on Stamets and Culbert, or more stories about Adira, or even more stories about Tilly. And Saru has had as many stories focused on him as Spock did in TOS. Do any of you really care if Owoseku, Detmer or Rhys get their very own stories? Or is it merely because a black lady is breathing too much air?
Culturally, politically, and linguistically, California is not considered a southern state. I tend not to hear accents unless they're extreme, but I'm not sure there is a specific California accent.Television American is based on the accent used in the Midwestern States. California is a Southern State.
WTF dude?! No it wasn't!Deep Space Nine is a known different take within the franchise, and was rejected summarily by the fandom for it.
I'm sure others have told you the actors had other commitments. This happens in the business - as I'm sure others have mentioned.I agree, but then...why the heck did they get written off and / or sidelined?
And let's face it, Tilly's usage since coming back this season has been drastically reduced from what it used to be.
One would hope by now such broad statements would be regarded as one's own observations, but since it requires clarification:WTF dude?! No it wasn't!
Are you speaking for "fandom" now?
Um...no. It does not. And who's we?Maybe they did.
I don't think that seems likely, though. It flies in the face of everything we've heard about working for an ongoing television show.
And seriously, how much time would it take for Jones to promote the movie? That's the type of thing that gets worked around the bigger stuff.That's only how actor contracts work if the Studio's specifically write up the contracts to work that way.
So saying "X actor was busy with Y" in this case, is the equivalent of saying the studio was okay with the actor just not being around for those episodes.
And seriously, how much time would it take for Jones to promote the movie? That's the type of thing that gets worked around the bigger stuff.
A show that is kind of a cross between Lower Decks the TNG ep and Stargate SG1
And seriously, how much time would it take for Jones to promote the movie? That's the type of thing that gets worked around the bigger stuff.
Agreed.Agreed. It doesnt make much sense.
And how much promo stuff did he do for Hocus Freaking Pocus 2?
I don't mean to tell others their business, but how much time would he need? More than a week? More than 7?
No, it makes no sense.
Yes, I know, but I also know that's exactly the type of sarcastic response you'd make to anyone else who sounded like they were speaking for all of fandom.One would hope by now such broad statements would be regarded as one's own observations, but since it requires clarification:
No, I'm not speaking for fandom. I am speaking for the reactions I saw and read about at conventions I went to and from friends. No, that doesn't encompass all of fandom because...*checks notes, does math* that's fucking impossible.
Hyperbole is hard in text.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.