Dumbest, eh?
Maybe in my top 10 of poor decisions buy dumbest? No.
Maybe in my top 10 of poor decisions buy dumbest? No.
This shouldn't make me laugh as hard as it did.Rayner: No the other time.
L'ak is only dead till they find the Progenitor Device.R.I.P. green boy.
Might make 2 seasons in a row where they have a resurrection.L'ak is only dead till they find the Progenitor Device.
They practically spelled that out in this very episode.
Remind me, who was resurrected last season?Might make 2 seasons in a row where they have a resurrection.
Book, sort of?Remind me, who was resurrected last season?
Didn't he get obliterated?Book, sort of?
A resurrection or a funeral...either way...Might make 2 seasons in a row where they have a resurrection.
Dumbest, eh?
Maybe in my top 10 of poor decisions buy dumbest? No.
WrongYou're right. The Burn's cause is the single dumbest decision the writers did for DISCO.
Literally the only thing the 32nd Century has shown itself to be better at is technological portability.All these centuries, and Starfleet security is actually WORSE than the 24th century.
It feels like Discovery ignores it's own history and episodes often because it does.Speaking of that situation, I thought Federation HQ could warp? Why was it stuck there, waiting for other Starfleet ships to arrive? It feels like DISCO ignores its own history and episodes often.
No, that would be the Burn itself.You're right. The Burn's cause is the single dumbest decision the writers did for DISCO.
So...Star Trek.Their whole writing style can be summed up with the words "this thing happens because we say it does".
The cause of the Burn would be the second dumbest decision of the Discovery writers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.