• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I like Ezri, but...

Retribution seems antithetical to Star Trek. Certainly, there have been times when the main characters act in a way that reflect the losses they had in the past, like Worf refusing to donate blood for an injured Romulan. However, it would ring untrue to end the series that way. Even Kirk could forgive the Klingons. DS9 ends by Sisko sacrificing himself, stopping Dukat from unleashing an apocalypse. It was an act to defend Bajor, not an act to eliminate a bad guy or to revenge a wrong. That's very Trek.

That's very Federation. It's not how a Bajoran terrorist freedom fighter would think about it.
 
No way. Kira should have killed Dukat. Kira had abundant reasons to kill Dukat before Worf was even at the station.

Agreed. She mentioned killing him on several occasions. Including one of my favorite Kira lines, the one about Ziyal. Just a simple death threat, but Kira delivers it with such conviction.

Was Kira still that person? Was she even that person after the

She gained a little poet to go with the warrior... but she was still a warrior.

In Duet she realized it was wrong to hate all Cardassians because of what some did.

Dukat was one of the ones who did.

Indeed. And after everything Dukat did to her and Bajor, she earned the right to blow his lights out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
I'm very wary of any Trek story where one of the good guys kills a bad guy in a situation where they don't have to.

Kira killing Dukat would absolutely be one of the exceptions to the rule.
(Assuming the story was engineered in a way that was satisfying, and not just "Kira decided today was the day" of course.)

But I also have no problem with her not being the one that took him down. I think she'd be completely satisfied that it happened*, and that's good enough for me.

*You have to wonder how much she even knows. Unless/until Sisko tells them the whole story, I assume most of what happened in the Fire Caves is unknown. As far as anyone knows, Dukat wasn't even there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
I'm very wary of any Trek story where one of the good guys kills a bad guy in a situation where they don't have to.

Kira killing Dukat would absolutely be one of the exceptions to the rule.
(Assuming the story was engineered in a way that was satisfying, and not just "Kira decided today was the day" of course.)

But I also have no problem with her not being the one that took him down. I think she'd be completely satisfied that it happened*, and that's good enough for me.

*You have to wonder how much she even knows. Unless/until Sisko tells them the whole story, I assume most of what happened in the Fire Caves is unknown. As far as anyone knows, Dukat wasn't even there.

Sisko has to report his actions to Starfleet, and good practice would be to report them to his 2nd in command too, unless there's some critical security reason for keeping her in the dark.
 
He appeared to Kasidy, he should be able to do the same for Starfleet and Kira, and I hope Jake.
 
I wish they had not introduced a new Dax character to the show and just wrote the character out of the series, Nothing against the actress, but like others have already said it felt like too much had to be introduced into the last season when the war could have filled up the remaining episodes.
 
I wish they had not introduced a new Dax character to the show and just wrote the character out of the series, Nothing against the actress, but like others have already said it felt like too much had to be introduced into the last season when the war could have filled up the remaining episodes.
Completely agreed. The idea of a neurotic Trill who was Joined unexpectedly and trying to deal with the emotional fallout had too much potential for one season anyway.
 
I have nothing against Terry, but I can't really envision Jadzia delivering the "The Klingon Empire is dying and it deserves to die" speech that Ezri did.
 
I wish they had not introduced a new Dax character to the show and just wrote the character out of the series, Nothing against the actress, but like others have already said it felt like too much had to be introduced into the last season when the war could have filled up the remaining episodes.
I agree, as a result the final episodes feels very rushed and underdeveloped. Her character isn't really the only problem though, I think in the last season they were throwing everything on the wall to see what sticks. "Hmm... Sisko is now the son of the Prophets!", "Look how amazing Vic Fontaine is, he's amazing because we're telling you he's amazing!" and so on.

Not only that, but it felt like a cop-out, they should just got rid of Dax completely. I cannot understand why they waste time on developing a completely new character on the last season, it feels like an exercise on futility, instead of focusing our remaining time on the characters we already have.

For example, imagine if in Star Wars on "Return of the Jedi", rather than have Luke Skywalker battling Darth Vader, we get introduced to a secret relative and we spend half of the movie with this random character. I mean, that would really suck. That's kind of how I feel with Ezri Dax.
 
Of all the Cousin Olivers in the history of television, Ezri Dax was the best.

How is Ezri a Cousin Oliver but Worf and Seven not? Just curious, I don't really remember the Brady Bunch much.

Not only that, but it felt like a cop-out, they should just got rid of Dax completely. I cannot understand why they waste time on developing a completely new character on the last season, it feels like an exercise on futility, instead of focusing our remaining time on the characters we already have.

This. If you're going to have the trauma of killing off the character, don't cop out by just bringing them back an episode later. That was annoying enough with Superman.
 
If you're going to have the trauma of killing off the character, don't cop out by just bringing them back an episode later.
Luckily, they didn't. Jadzia remained dead.

For example, imagine if in Star Wars on "Return of the Jedi", rather than have Luke Skywalker battling Darth Vader, we get introduced to a secret relative and we spend half of the movie with this random character.
If Ezri actually stepped into Sisko's role I'd agree, that's not what happened.

Why did they even bother to introduce Jabba in Return of the Jedi ? Or Wicket? Or Ackbar? They should have focused their remaining time on the previously established characters. ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top