Chris Claremont is incompetent and misogynistic?She also was written horribly 50 years ago because she was unlucky enough to be stuck with incompetent, misogynistic writers who didn't know what to do with her. Which is why she spent the 80s, 90s and 2000s as a punching bag character until she got upgraded to Captain Marvel around 2012...and certain folks were mad because they preferred her as the punching bag.
That's a big thing, Carol finally being written with some respect after decades of getting none.
Chris Claremont is incompetent and misogynistic?
Uncanny 230-something, Wolverine and Rogue are depowered and trapped behind enemy lines in the mutant enslaving nation Genosha... Rogue snapped and a back up of Carol's personality from when she sucked the real Carol dry of personality and superpowers, took up the slack, so fake Carol and logan use 1970s coldwar spy craft to breach a fascist dictators fortress and get their powers back before Logan dies of kidney disease from adamantium poisioning.He certainly wasn't good to Carol, no. He undid that awful "She gets brainwashed into falling in love with her rapist" story but everything else he did with her was pretty bad.
Not even remotely.![]()
That said, I can tell you the original comic version of BP (in many of his early appearances) did rub some black American readers the wrong way, as they felt he was written as the half stoic, half deferential African stereotype used in endless novels and movies up that period. It took some time before BP was given a somewhat less offensive personality in late 60s / early 70s appearances (some of that can attributed to Roy Thomas's stories) taking cues from real life (think of the political / self-identity landscape for black people in that time).
It's a historic failure. From a film that did 1.131B WW, to a film that won't even cross 100M domestic at this pace.
I don't think the film industry has seen anything like this before, so it's fascinating. There will be a lot of post-mortem analysis in the industry about everything they did wrong here.
Er, wasn't this what happened with Wonder Woman and WW1984 as well?
Honestly, the way this is getting singled out for abuse is really getting silly. Especially when you don't take into account how the Movie Business Landscape changed between 2019 and now.
No, it really isn't. And certainly not more interesting than the film itself.It's a historic failure. From a film that did 1.131B WW, to a film that won't even cross 100M domestic at this pace.
I don't think the film industry has seen anything like this before, so it's fascinating. There will be a lot of post-mortem analysis in the industry about everything they did wrong here.
It's a historic failure. From a film that did 1.131B WW, to a film that won't even cross 100M domestic at this pace.
I don't think the film industry has seen anything like this before, so it's fascinating. There will be a lot of post-mortem analysis in the industry about everything they did wrong here.
Speaking of the film, can we actually talk about the film itself instead of all of these inane sidebars about its box office whatevers?
Especially after Mario, Barbie, Oppenheimer, Guardians, etc this year.
The fault of "The Marvels" is in the film itself, and it's lack of appeal to mainstream movie goers.
Incel Super Bowl. I like that.I saw someone refer to the celebration of box office failure the "incel Super Bowl." They didn't get it with Barbie, so they double downed on The Marvels, now they're going after Madame Web.
And Indiana Jones?Guardians didn't do as well as expected/hoped, got proper marketing and promotions. Barbie/Oppenheimer/Mario weren't available on a Streaming service super soon and also got way better promotions and marketing. Barbieheimer was all over the media.
Is that why Blade Runner 2049 failed?
The movie business landscape is essentially back to a stable place now. Especially after Mario, Barbie, Oppenheimer, Guardians, etc this year.
And Indiana Jones?
# of movies to surpass $1 billion in 2023: 2
# of movies to surpass $1 billion in 2019: 9
Yeah, we're nowhere near back to pre-pandemic levels. Not even a little bit.
ETA: And people's streaming habits aren't going to help things get back to where they were.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.