Since many Maquis were Starfleet traitors and used their ranks and positions to give intelligence, supplies, weapons, etc. to the Maquis, it did become a problem for Starfleet.
They use to be our people. They're your problem now. Why should Starfleet give a damn about the internal rebellions happening on some disconnected world... regardless of whether they're undertaken by former UFP citizens?
And for the Federation.Since many Maquis were Starfleet traitors and used their ranks and positions to give intelligence, supplies, weapons, etc. to the Maquis, it did become a problem for Starfleet.
Yes, but I still find their usage here manipulative on the side of the writer.Back in 1990-whatever I misunderstood who Picard was talking about because I had recently seen the TOS episode The Paradise Syndrome, where the Preservers moved some Native Americans to space, centuries before Christopher Columbus did not discover America.
Rewatching the episode years later, I said "Doh".
According to the Voyager bible, Chakotay's Tribe left Earth in the early 23rd century under their own power, probably because Whitey took their land all over again, after America dissolved and was assimilated by the United Earth.
So was Picard talking about the 18th and 19th century, where "they" took America, or the 22nd century when the United Earth disenfranchised Native American culture, 85 years after World War three undid the United States.
Almost certainly the Cowboy stuff.
I have never liked how the franchise portrayed the Maquis, especially in TNG and DS9. Talk about creating a storyline in which the main protagonists upheld the status quo. How conservative of the franchise.
What I never understood is... OK, so they don't want to leave & accept the consequences of no longer being under UFP jurisdiction. Fine. Gonna suck for you, but that's your choice. The ties have been cut & I can actually get behind that, from either PoV
So then, as expected, things begin to suck & an insurgency comes about, & it becomes an ugly issue for those their rebelling against. HTF is this our issue anymore?
They use to be our people. They're your problem now. Why should Starfleet give a damn about the internal rebellions happening on some disconnected world... regardless of whether they're undertaken by former UFP citizens?
You took em. You took the good with the bad. Now I can see not wanting there to be underground support happening from our side, but ultimately their resourses are their own, & if they get to being tough customers, not my problem to fix for y'all. We are out of it, no matter what happens. So, maybe I missed some of it, but while I don't support the Maqui, I don't condemn them either, nor do I act against them. I'm Switzerland Bubba
Not all change is good change, after all.
TNG posited diplomacy as a net positive, something necessary for the benefits of the Federation to be meaningful and enjoyed by its citizens. However, it was never posited that there were things that by raison d'etat, might conflict with other values of the Federation. Althought the treaty signed after Journey's End was flawed, it nevertheless created a framework for addressing political problems between the two entities over the definitions of the borders and gave some mechanism for resolving grievances that were far less than war. And in spite of everything, the Cardassian Union did not go to war with either Federation or the Maquis colonies, even though it seemed to be always on the cusp of doing so. It was the Dominion, with new member Cardassia, that eliminated the Maquis. Moreover, it was not the purpose of the Dominion action to acquiesce to Cardassian interests (although I am sure that many Cardassians were happy), but part of a larger strategy of gaining hegemony over the Alpha Quadrant. Although it may have looked as if the Federation played it conservative with regards to the border planets, it helped to hold down the level of violence to some extent.Maintaining the status quo for the sake of conservatism. That's the name of the game for today's pop culture.
TNG posited diplomacy as a net positive, something necessary for the benefits of the Federation to be meaningful and enjoyed by its citizens. However, it was never posited that there were things that by raison d'etat, might conflict with other values of the Federation. Althought the treaty signed after Journey's End was flawed, it nevertheless created a framework for addressing political problems between the two entities over the definitions of the borders and gave some mechanism for resolving grievances that were far less than war. And in spite of everything, the Cardassian Union did not go to war with either Federation or the Maquis colonies, even though it seemed to be always on the cusp of doing so. It was the Dominion, with new member Cardassia, that eliminated the Maquis. Moreover, it was not the purpose of the Dominion action to acquiesce to Cardassian interests (although I am sure that many Cardassians were happy), but part of a larger strategy of gaining hegemony over the Alpha Quadrant. Although it may have looked as if the Federation played it conservative with regards to the border planets, it helped to hold down the level of violence to some extent.
Maintaining the status quo for the sake of conservatism. That's the name of the game for today's pop culture.
I wonder whether we'd be having this conversation if the Maquis had blown up the entirety of Deep Space Nine rather than just a ship docked there, even if the station had merely been unintended collateral damage.
Yeah, probably.I wonder whether we'd be having this conversation if the Maquis had blown up the entirety of Deep Space Nine rather than just a ship docked there, even if the station had merely been unintended collateral damage.
Yeah, Because the federation abandoned them.
The federation had a duty to protect them and not give them up to space NAZI's to buy a few years of false peace.
Why should they? It was their home.They were given opportunity to evacuate prior to the planet being handed over to the Cardassians,
live under a fascists?They did not have to leave. They could have stayed and lived under Cardassian rule. Of course, the Cardassians might have ended up evicting them anyway.
Fhe federation was appeasing fascists.And for the Federation.
What seems to be completely ignored in the ideas around the Maquis is that this was done as a treaty to stop a war that had already created extreme amount of conflict between two powers. Regardless of one might think of the treaty, the idea that continuing war is somehow more appropriate than finding a way to continue piece is a strange one to me, especially in light of episodes like "The Wounded" and Picard's approach to the Cardassian treaty. Watchful but supportive.
The Maquis act basically was trying guarantee the war would continue with little regard for the consequences, especially with support from Starfleet officers. The Cardassians would not care about were the weapons came from; only that the Federation was supporting attacks on their people.
How is that beneficial to anyone?
The marquis were originally living in territory controlled by the federation.The Federation didn’t abandon the Maquis.
The Maquis abandoned the Federation. They made a conscious choice to do so.
The Federation didn’t help them because it’s precisely situations such as that which have a tendency to spark wars.
The Maquis were not forced to live on Cardassian territory. They chose to. They brought it all down on themselves. They were offered an out and they didn’t take it.
Fuck them.
Why should they? It was their home.
No, it wasn't. The Federation had the colonists' FULL CONSENT to live in Cardassian territory.The marquis never choose that. The decision to take away their homes and hand it over to fascist was made by a federation council light years away without thier consent.
Living under fascism is not nor should ever be a choice.When the Federation can 1) give you a new home for free, and 2) precisely re-create your old one down to the molecular level, "home" is irrelevant. "Sacred ground" is irrelevant.
No, it wasn't. The Federation had the colonists' FULL CONSENT to live in Cardassian territory.
At what cost?Now, the argument for 'appeasement' COULD theoretically be made. But when the alternative is war...appeasement works.![]()
The federation made the decision to stab them in the back and hand over their homes and land to lizard space nazis in a attempt at appeasement.
Maintaining the status quo for the sake of conservatism. That's the name of the game for today's pop culture.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.