To me, looks like it's about the same size as what we see in TOS. Beautiful pics!
It's significantly larger.To me, looks like it's about the same size as what we see in TOS. Beautiful pics!
It's significantly larger.
Plus, the shuttles are a bit larger as well.big time, the TOS bay only looked like they could land one shuttle at a time. The 1701-A could fit two but it was a tight fit. This one fits 4 with room to spare.
TOS Shuttle Bay
![]()
TOS-R Shuttlebay
![]()
![]()
TAS Shuttle Bay
![]()
Was just about to say the SNW shuttlebay immediately made me think of TAS. Fundamentally makes more sense as you'd want the utility space. Another neat thing is the TOS secondary hull shape implies the bay has space below it for storing more shuttles/maintenance versus the SNW likely single deck shuttlebay so I just see it as they just reorganized how space was utilized between the shuttlebay/cargo when updating the hull shape (TMPs bay/cargo area also implies that structural change combining spaces).For comparison
Looks like TOS-R made the shuttle bay smaller (or the shuttles bigger)
It seems they might be fudging the size for the beauty shot though (I don't have a problem with it, but I'm still gonna talk about it). You see assuming the enterprise is modeled as 442 meters long that bay door would be ~19 meters wide, and from what we know of the dimensions of the sets the interiors of the shuttles are 25ft(7.62 meters) wide, add a meter to either side (eyeballing) for the hull plating, engine nacelles, and attaching pylons, and parking would be much tighter in there than what we see.big time, the TOS bay only looked like they could land one shuttle at a time. The 1701-A could fit two but it was a tight fit. This one fits 4 with room to spare.
2 - Columbus
5 - Cervantes
7 - Galileo
? - Stamets
![]()
Kelcie Mae reminds me of the 2001 spaceplane![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.