Tellar Prime really must be all kinds of integral to the Federation. It was the only one of the founding members to stay in the Federation after the Burn after all.
Oh my...Longest continuous member.
Thank you! I just re-watched that episode too! The line must've slipped past my rounded ears.It's implied in TOS: "The Conscience of the King":
Spock: "My father's race was spared the dubious benefits of alcohol."
McCoy: "Now I know why they were conquered."
You might want to add "clean" and "reasonably sure I won't get murdered in the night" to that list based on a few places I've stayed.Just give me a bed, toilet, shower, TV, WiFi and access to food and something to drink. It's a hotel. If it's not my honeymoon and my new wife isn't really picky I don't care if it's not a five-star palace with a cool painting on the wall.
8/10, a thoroughly enjoyable episode. I thought it was absurd that a character is named Noonien Singh was included and that has colored my view of the character a bit. However, Christina Chong was absolutely brilliant in this episode and they pulled off the connection well, though contrived, so I'll probably warm up to her a bit.
What was this episode about?
Lana
I don’t think it was contrived because Lana was sexually attracted to Kirk from the start.
About the trauma of opening yourself up and then losing the one you came to love.
La'an. Her name is La'an. This is Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, not Smallville.
Eh? I mean, in the broadest possible definition of the term, maybe. I think her attraction to him was from the very beginning more rooted in emotion than in sex per se.
The right wing politicians? No.Her ovaries are cursed.
Jim Kirk was the First man to not look at her like she is unclean.
Would you date a great grand child of Mussolini?
Would you marry a great grand child of Mussolini, and take their name?
Would you make babies with a great grand child of Mussolini and give your babies the surname Mussolini?
Their beliefs can evolve.People online have pointed out that Sera's revelation that the Romulans are using advanced AI to do their time travel math for them contradicts Picard's reveal that they hate AI and don't use it. Also, Sera's photos indicate the Romulans are from the 23rd century, or use at least 23rd century ships, but it's also possible that they're from the 29th century like the Time police shown here. However, the timeline of Discovery makes it seem likely the Romulans by the 29th century should be already in the Federation AND like it so much they actively want to stay after the Burn a few hundred years later.
Basically it's not clear when these Romulans are from considering all of the above
Just because a majority of Romulans in the 31st century supported Federation membership doesn't mean there can't be a renegade faction who are still against the Federation in the 29th century. Indeed, we know from Unification III there are Romulan insurgents fighting against the Vulcans on Ni'var in the 32nd century.the timeline of Discovery makes it seem likely the Romulans by the 29th century should be already in the Federation AND like it so much they actively want to stay after the Burn a few hundred years later.
The following lines from the TNG S3 episode The Defector seems to indicate that the romulans were aware and creating AI:People online have pointed out that Sera's revelation that the Romulans are using advanced AI to do their time travel math for them contradicts Picard's reveal that they hate AI and don't use it. Also, Sera's photos indicate the Romulans are from the 23rd century, or use at least 23rd century ships, but it's also possible that they're from the 29th century like the Time police shown here. However, the timeline of Discovery makes it seem likely the Romulans by the 29th century should be already in the Federation AND like it so much they actively want to stay after the Burn a few hundred years later.
Basically it's not clear when these Romulans are from considering all of the above
SETAL: You're the android. I know a host of Romulan cyberneticists that would love to be this close to you.
DATA: I do not find that concept particularly appealing.
SETAL: Nor should you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.