From a world-building perspective, you don't think it's a bit inconsistent that you've introduced a drug that Starfleet personnel take to have artificial superior abilities, and in the very next episode you have one of the main characters on trial by the same organization for having artificially induced superior abilities?
As others have said, inconsistency and hypocrisy are in fact quite plausible traits for Federation society to have. I mean, hell, we in the United States loudly proclaim ourselves as the land of the free and home of the brave even as we incarcerate a larger per capita percentage of our population than almost any other country on Earth.
And I can also see the root of how Federation anti-Augment bigots would rationalize the inconsistency: the serum's effects lasted less than five minutes, which is a very different thing from permanently augmenting your DNA.
Beyond being a bit silly, my main objection is that this doesn't fit well with everything else. Yes, you can point to other silly things, other fictional drugs, other magic tech. But that doesn't make this good writing because other stupid shit has made it to screen, especially since it's not consistent with the Federation we've seen over the course of a half-century of episodes where it's about the ability of humanity and idealistic human values to overcome.
This complaint is just silly. Star Trek is full of magic technologies that gave people advanced abilities and then weren't widely deployed for reasons unknown. And a serum to make you a better puncher for five minutes in an emergency doesn't nullify human idealism.
Hopefully they will lift the ban on genetic engineering moving forward or have Genetic Engineering Regulations as to what can be modified.
Well, we know it's in place at least through the end of DS9 in 2375. I would like to imagine that it was repealed around the same time the Federation repealed the ban on Synthetics circ 2399 at the end of PIC S1.
I think you judge on the person... and in this case I don't felt it realistic to have both healers in fisty cuffs.
You, uh, don't think it's realistic for commissioned officers of a military force who survived a brutal large-scale war to have combat experience, huh?
You're being too literal. I don't buy Deanna as a warrior. I don't buy Chapel as a warrior.
Who said she's a warrior? She's a Starfleet officer.
I find her story unbelievable. She serves many functions from unprofessional to warrior to tech expert to love interest... it doesn't gel for me.
Well that's a "you" problem, because the idea that she could simultaneously be a combat veteran and a medical officer and have relationships with other people is not only realistic -- I promise you, there are plenty of people who meet that description today.