it would certainly lower the budget. could just have his torpedo tube sitting around, complaining about things.Somehow I can't see us getting a Captain Liam Shaw tv Star Trek show anymore...
JB
it would certainly lower the budget. could just have his torpedo tube sitting around, complaining about things.Somehow I can't see us getting a Captain Liam Shaw tv Star Trek show anymore...
JB
Or Seven saves him with Borg nanoprobes which has precendent. It would freak out a guy who has serious and legit Borgphobia and be an excellent character study of someone being helped.
To be fair, most of those characters hadn't been seen in so long, as in decades, that we never expected to see them again anyway. If you're unlikely to ever use the characters again, why not give them a big dramatic death scene instead of consigning them back to limbo?
I mean, it's not as though killing Shelby means we're never going to get the STAR TREK: SHELBY series we've all be waiting for since the eighties.
I probably shouldn't admit this but I often breathe a sigh of relief when I kill off a character because it feels like tidying up loose ends. Means I'm on the downward slope and getting closer to wrapping up a story. Not unlike spring cleaning.
So? Because we haven't seen a character in a while (and will likely not see them again), they should die? For some faux sense of "closure?"
It's still a crappy storytelling decision to litter your series with a series of random, increasingly meanginless deaths. Sure, no one expected to see Shelby again (so?), but her death scene was still cruddy and was the furthest thing from "tidy."
indeed. And lest not forget that him dying to let his crew mates escape is a sort of atonement for escaping at Wolf 359 while his friends died.I think this could be interesting since it would allow for a deeper exploration of the character. The Borgphobia could be one angle but also coming back from the dead would be a heck of an experience that could really mess up Shaw, especially since he seemed at peace with dying. He could have even more survivor's guilt as a result.
This kind of thing is so pretentious. It’s not like he’s Laurence Olivier or anything.
So? Because we haven't seen a character in a while (and will likely not see them again), they should die? For some faux sense of "closure?"
It's still a crappy storytelling decision to litter your series with a series of random, increasingly meanginless deaths.
Turns out the actors playing the Titan bridge crew are all in their 30s or older! And Ashlei Sharpe Chestnut, who plays Sidney LaForge, is as old as LeVar Burton was when he started on TNG!
![]()
Becoming an admiral was fine, because he was still making a difference. The moment he ignored Kirk’s advice was when he tried to use his resignation as a bargaining tool. Quite neat really.
One of the main reasons the entire plot of Nemesis doesn't work is that the Romulans had no idea that Picard would become as significant as he did, even with the latest possible year for Shinzon's apparent age. They could've resolved this by explicitly stating him to be aging faster akin to the clones in Star Wars, but apparently the only modification done to him was a trigger that would swiftly age him up to Picard's current age in a few weeks or so and instead ended up killing him.
Baby bath during season two?!? And you’re an admiral now?!?
So I recently saw a TrekCulture theory that the reason that the Romulans chose Picard to clone was because of the intel they received from Tasha Yar post Yesterday’s Enterprise.
Koval, when hearing about Shinzon: "She did WHAT again? By Vorta Vor, this woman gets on my nerves..."Have to admit, it always implicitly seemed the case. Shinzon has ‘Sela’s batshit plan’ written all over it.
Sorry fleet captain lolWhat?
I'm really curious what Discovery will inevitably do with them in the 32nd century.(I know LOWER DECKS had a Borg in the future, but that could have been one from "UNITY" or one of Jurati's Borg. I just want the Borg ended already.)
Koval, when hearing about Shinzon: "She did WHAT again? By Vorta Vor, this woman gets on my nerves..."
I always preferred the idea that the Romulans cloned several up-and-coming Starfleet officers, and it was just luck that Picard's clone managed to amass some small amount of clout that could be built upon, and the rest died in the mines.So I recently saw a TrekCulture theory that the reason that the Romulans chose Picard to clone was because of the intel they received from Tasha Yar post Yesterday’s Enterprise.
My Trek knowledge got me entries on IMDb for myself and for the fanfilms I wrote so I must have done at least something right.
So I recently saw a TrekCulture theory that the reason that the Romulans chose Picard to clone was because of the intel they received from Tasha Yar post Yesterday’s Enterprise.
Um, no. The computer says, "Command transferred to Captain Jean Luc Picard."Sorry if this has been discussed before. I think they either had a script edit error, or a Burton ad-lib, or something just completely flew under the radar during editing near the end when they were all in the shuttle:
Worf: “Will she fly?”
“La Forge: “What do you think, Captain?”
Picard: “She will fly…”
Did Geordi just gave Jean Luc a field demotion before the Enterprise computer did the same moments later?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.