It’s weird that they put these two episodes together. It doesn’t make the crew look good getting fooled twice in a row.As opposed to being fooled into complicity with the sacrifice of a sentient child three times in a single episode, and then getting fooled by a pirate in the very next episode.
Welcome to episodic Trek.We didn't hear of this world again after this episode. Maybe at some point, the next First Servant was rescued before she could be plugged into that house of horrors, and the inevitable happened.
Just commenting on the nature of the show. Very little follow up in episodic Trek.If you prefer that they made their way to the 24th century and beyond, slaughtering an endless series of First Servants, that is also very much a possibility. Until an answer is given, we can set our head canon as we see fit.
I know, for better or for worse. There are lots of one-off characters whose fate I wonder about, and will likely never know.Just commenting on the nature of the show. Very little follow up in episodic Trek.
I always do.Head cannon away.
Very true. I will add "The Outcast" and "Repentance" to that list. And "When the Bough Breaks" would have presented a much stronger message with a darker ending (and made more sense, too).Sometimes the cold, chilling and sad endings are the most appropriate in order to teach the lesson of the story.
As I recall, that got covered in a novel.It's like Cheron. Did one of the two men actually survive?
My point exactly.It’s weird that they put these two episodes together. It doesn’t make the crew look good getting fooled twice in a row.
I'm not so sure... while I'd love to see the Enterprise return to this world and atone for the atrocity it helped commit, I think that things were pretty well resolved at the end.I think they should leave this story hanging, but I suspect that they won't for long.
Such stories are far more powerful without a resolution. Not every problem can be fixed and the “good guys” don’t always win are worth being reminded of.I think they should leave this story hanging, but I suspect that they won't for long.
Then it's not a story. A story has a problem, someone trying to fix the problem, then the problem being fixed.Such stories are far more powerful without a resolution. Not every problem can be fixed and the “good guys” don’t always win are worth being reminded of.
Wrong. Stories do not require a resolution. Sometimes the whole point of the story is to make the individual reader/viewer/listener do a bit of mental exercise and think about possibilities. A story likely shouldn’t end on a cliffhanger with no follow through, but it doesn’t have to have a neatly tied up conclusion either. This episode didn’t “solve the problem” but it wasn’t a truncated cliffhanger either. It simply presented a situation that doesn’t have an easy solution. It’s called nuance and nuance is a feature, not a bug, in storytelling, as well as for a whole host of other things.Then it's not a story. A story has a problem, someone trying to fix the problem, then the problem being fixed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.