Well, that’s your choice. No one is forcing you to stop posting because other people aren’t automatically toting your line.
No. Its that its very tired to always see that the default answer to an idea is that no one want to see it. Or the characters aren’t popular and not worth bringing back. Even though the suggestions are in support of the shows on the air. Then we see what some people produce what they think fans want to see or is popular and it sometimes misses the mark or is received badly. There’s nothing fun about that, or having to once again debate why various suggested ideas should be considered.
I wasn’t asking for an Enterprise-B show starring Alan Ruck. Its probably too late for that as too much time has passed, barring animation. And if a character needs to be recast for the Short Trek, okay, since these aren’t major characters to begin with.
But I don’t see the big deal in using a few of these minor legacy characters from TUC and GEN – movies from a popular time in Star Trek history, the same popularity that is the reason for giving fans more Kirk, Spock, Picard and the rest of TNG - to tell a story that can relate to the current shows. In this case, a future season of DIS, as the Discovery crew have their history with Klingons and the crew relying on the experiences of their peers of that era (Harriman, both Sulus, Chekov, Scotty, Spock, Kirk, Uhura, Chapel) during the early days of peace with the Klingon Empire will help them understand how they handled adjusting to peacefully coexisting with the Klingons when they eventually meet them again. Since they aren’t going to read up on 900 years of Federation-Klingon history. And if the writers cannot make such a story fit, that’s not on me.
So far, any actually thoughts and feelings the Discovery crew may have on Romulans as the crew understood them, Archer’s era, and what happens to Pike and Sarek always end up being buried. I don’t see why this needs to now be extended to Klingons, especially when the Discovery crew were interacting with Klingons before they jumped to the 32nd century.
Now, if you personally don’t care to see a Short Trek with such characters, fine. But don’t speak for the whole fanbase when you reject the idea. Especially when today’s Star Trek likes to use Easter eggs to callback to previous shows and movies. And mainly the hardcore fans are the ones that watched Short Treks anyways, since its not aimed at a casual audience.