@Noname Given
I might be totally brainfarting but I'm sure the 1701-A gets a redressed Excelsior bridge?
I might be totally brainfarting but I'm sure the 1701-A gets a redressed Excelsior bridge?
The 1701-A first appears in Star Trek IV The Voyage Home.@Noname Given
I might be totally brainfarting but I'm sure the 1701-A gets a redressed Excelsior bridge?
Other way around.@Noname Given
I might be totally brainfarting but I'm sure the 1701-A gets a redressed Excelsior bridge?
@Noname Given
I might be totally brainfarting but I'm sure the 1701-A gets a redressed Excelsior bridge?
The Enterprise-B got a reworked Excelsior bridge which was based in part on the TUC version of the Enterprise-A.
same set in movies 1 to 4 but each time modified (a lot for the second movie, not so much afterwards).I think it may have been the same set in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek III The Search for Spock, but in general, yes.
that was an entirely different (and only partial) set and it was indeed bigger than the Undiscovered Country one. In fact the Excelsior miniature was modified to reflect the smaller bridge module!Maybe it was the framing or the lenses, but the Excelsior bridge in ST3 looked huge.
![]()
however, it was mounted on motors that could actually shake the set to simulate the explosions, a big surprise for the old time actors!Yeah, the 1701-B bridge is pretty close to an exact copy of the TUC Excelsior bridge with just some stations and control interfaces switched around, and, of course, the red digital clocks removed from the design.
same set in movies 1 to 4 but each time modified (a lot for the second movie, not so much afterwards).
Then the set was destroyed in a fire and the studios was forced to build a new one, only thing saved was the conn station, which had to me reworked a lot anyway. Meyer used the same set for movie 6 but had it heavily modified to make it look more militaristic.
It certainly did! I doubt that we saw more than a quarter of the compartment!Maybe it was the framing or the lenses, but the Excelsior bridge in ST3 looked huge.
![]()
Dave Blass is also using that to explain why they're reusing the Stargazer bridge on a new ship in PIC Season 3.Bridge designs changed so much in the TOS movies that I believe it was Mike Okuda who came up with the idea that bridges are modular capsules that can be installed, uninstalled, and swapped out between ships, in order to explain the differences.
same set in movies 1 to 4 but each time modified (a lot for the second movie, not so much afterwards).
Then the set was destroyed in a fire and the studios was forced to build a new one, only thing saved was the conn station, which had to me reworked a lot anyway. Meyer used the same set for movie 6 but had it heavily modified to make it look more militaristic.
totally agreed here: the STV bridge embodies the kind of positive vibe it had in TOS and not in the other movies.*For my money, Meyer's changes vandalized a rather brilliant piece of work by Zimmerman and the other designers and graphic artists on ST 5, for the sake of servicing the director's aesthetic fascination with the more military undertones of Trek (hey, it worked once, so why not again? Well, not so much, this time). I know that Meyer's fans will disagree with that.
however, it was mounted on motors that could actually shake the set to simulate the explosions, a big surprise for the old time actors!
Wasn't that just the Enterprise-D bridge?however, it was mounted on motors that could actually shake the set to simulate the explosions, a big surprise for the old time actors!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.