They were mentioned, and they were referred to as being male.
The Romulan Praetor was referred to in the episode, and referred to as a male.The Romulan Praetor was in BoT?
Romulan Commander: "Perhaps we can yet save your Praetor's pride for him. More debris into the tubes. Decius, do we have the old-style nuclear warheads aboard?"
On the show where EVERY SINGLE THING LOOKS DIFFERENT, we're using how a uniform looks as proof of anything?Even affected uniform design.
On the show where EVERY SINGLE THING LOOKS DIFFERENT, we're using how a uniform looks as proof of anything?
Come on. Come onnnnnnnn.
Well, he wasn't the Kirk we know yet.I do think that the Jim Kirk actor could have done a little more… Jim Kirk.
there is no Botany Bay in TWoK, those are cargo containers left by the enterprise. Chekhov reads the name on a belt buckle left dangling there.On the other, by that argument, that wasn’t the Botany Bay in ST II then, was it?
They completely abandoned the SS Botany Bay in TOS S1 Space Seed (left it intact and adrift in space).And even if they had been a part of the Botany Bay they would have been a part of the ship we didn't see in "Space Seed(TOS)." There's no discrepancy there.
Khan had to abandon his collection of early 90s heavy metalThey completely abandoned the SS Botany Bay in TOS S1 Space Seed (left it intact and adrift in space).
He's wasn't actually exiled there - that was just a cover story to escape a date with JaniceThat alone justifies his exile to Ceti Alpha V.
FTFYWell, it's Kirk, Jim, but not as we know it.
I think it may have been the same set in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek III The Search for Spock, but in general, yes.Isn't the Enterprise bridge different in pretty much every TOS movie?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.