• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers She-Hulk: Attorney at Law discussion thread

Really, really enjoyed that. The post credits scene was hilarious :lol:

The CGI looked great too.


These sexist misogynists (pretty obvious racist too after some of the Ms Marvel comments) out there are just the ultimate cringe. How embarrassing to be like that.
 
I wonder if in the near future, these review bombers will disguise their attacks better. Like, thousands of 1s is obviously an attack, but if it was thousands of 4s and 5s... The premiere is 16% 1s (ridiculous) and 30% 10s (also ridiculous).

Heh - rating by males 18-29 for the premiere: 7.4. Females in the same group: 8.5.
 
Really, really enjoyed that. The post credits scene was hilarious :lol:

The CGI looked great too.


These sexist misogynists (pretty obvious racist too after some of the Ms Marvel comments) out there are just the ultimate cringe. How embarrassing to be like that.


What is truly pathetic about them is that they don't have the good sense to be embarrassed.
 
Before or after you saw it? The ratings shown the other day were from reviews before it released.
After.

The poster said "The premiere is..." which read literally means after it has premiered.

The post itself was posted after the premier.

If the beef is that the ratings exist before the premier, then it makes no difference whatsoever what the number is, and 1, 4, 5, and 10 are all equally absurd.

With the discussion of 4s and 5s being somehow more plausible, that would imply further that the discussion was about ratings given after the premier.
 
After.

The poster said "The premiere is..." which read literally means after it has premiered.

The post itself was posted after the premier.

If the beef is that the ratings exist before the premier, then it makes no difference whatsoever what the number is, and 1, 4, 5, and 10 are all equally absurd.

With the discussion of 4s and 5s being somehow more plausible, that would imply further that the discussion was about ratings given after the premier.

Look more closely. I was speculating that review bombers will use 4s and 5s to lower ratings in the future to disguise their actions. They will probably also wait for the event to air.
 
Look more closely. I was speculating that review bombers will use 4s and 5s to lower ratings in the future to disguise their actions. They will probably also wait for the event to air.
No one cares what these ratings are. They do not contribute diddlysquat to deciding what gets made or how it gets tweaked.

And I looked plenty close to see that you called a rating of ten absurd, when it clearly isn't. What you said now was completely clear on first reading and irrelevant to the point that a rating of ten is quite plausible.
 
No one cares what these ratings are. They do not contribute diddlysquat to deciding what gets made or how it gets tweaked.

And I looked plenty close to see that you called a rating of ten absurd, when it clearly isn't.
A rating of 10 is absurd for anything ever. You can only give it if you are sure that absolutely not a single thing could have been improved. Otherwise, your favorite show should be a 9.
 
I've been looking forward to this because I like Maslany. I enjoyed it for the most part, even though I didn't really see it as a comedy, at least not yet. I thought the chemistry between Bruce and Jen was great though, and the end credits scene was great . Looking forward to more.

If I were to rate it out of 10, I would probably give it a 7. It did the job but it was only episode 1. There's a lot more room to grow.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top