Indeed. And it's quite interesting to try and make sense of the Eugenics Wars, given its also WW3 but the conflict of WW3 was in the 21st century.Nope, not at all. Continuity and Canon are two different things.
Indeed. And it's quite interesting to try and make sense of the Eugenics Wars, given its also WW3 but the conflict of WW3 was in the 21st century.Nope, not at all. Continuity and Canon are two different things.
both establish that this is an event that happens in our near future but Trek's past.
It's not an agree or disagree thing, they both have different definitions.I don't agree.
What time period you live in. Before 2022 they were in the 90s, but from now on they're sometime post 2021.And what point of view could that possibly be?
Why are the dates important?And again: why is that important?
Trek has treated itself as part of our timeline. Hence the LA IN Voyager is our LA, not a wartorn cityscape.And again: why is that important?
Trek's timeline has always been separate and distinct from our own. You can't just keep moving the goalposts just because they don't sync up. Because they're never going to.
Why are the dates important?
T Hence the LA IN Voyager is our LA, not a wartorn cityscape.
I find it hard to believe that it would not be mentioned. Whole populations bombed out of existence, World War 3 ongoing and Paris' comments are about having a fast car.The USA was not involved in the Eugenics Wars.
That has never been stated in any series.The USA was not involved in the Eugenics Wars.
Trek actually cares about continuity.
At least I thought it did.
And again: why is that important?
You can't just keep moving the goalposts just because they don't sync up.
Not canon.
But you were just arguing about canon.Not caring.
Actually, the show has never treated itself as part of our timeline. It's "close" to our reality, with similar cultural trends and social problems, but it's not our history. This was clear when Kirk and Spock stopped the launch of an orbital nuclear platform in 1968; it was clear this summer when Picard and company visited a version of 2024 that includes personal force fields, human cloning, a manned voyage to Europa, and (Easter-eggy) references to things like Sanctuary Districts and Jackson Roykirk, creator of the Nomad probe.Trek has treated itself as part of our timeline. Hence the LA IN Voyager is our LA, not a wartorn cityscape.
Sorry, Trek is massively inconsistent on this point. The Eugenics Wars are reported to be the "last of Earth's World Wars," so "World War 3." World War 3, according to TNG, happens in the 21st century, including the "post atomic horror" until first contact with the Vulcans.Actually, the show has never treated itself as part of our timeline. It's "close" to our reality, with similar cultural trends and social problems, but it's not our history. This was clear when Kirk and Spock stopped the launch of an orbital nuclear platform in 1968; it was clear this summer when Picard and company visited a version of 2024 that includes personal force fields, human cloning, a manned voyage to Europa, and (Easter-eggy) references to things like Sanctuary Districts and Jackson Roykirk, creator of the Nomad probe.
It's not our history. It never was, it never will be, it never can be. And in Trek's history, the Eugenics Wars happened between 1992 and 1996.
So, canon status is no longer important? Got it.Not caring.
So, canon status is no longer important? Got it.![]()
TNG placed it in the 21st century first with saying WW3 happened in the 21st Century, which TOS connects with the Eugenics Wars.Well, they have always mentioned Eugenics WarS. Plural.
So given that "Space Seed" and TWOK mentioned Eugenics Wars taking place from 1992 to 1996 - and, apparently, SNW mentions wars taking place in the 21st century - therefore, they can be both true.
TNG placed it in the 21st century first with saying WW3 happened in the 21st Century, which TOS connects with the Eugenics Wars.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.