I apologize if the "Why?" at the end of your post was rhetorical.The topic is 'what changes would I make after 4 seasons.' And I answered the question. Or at least I implied that the show should end. I can't speak for other people.
Joint 2nd most popular of the modern Treks on this very site.I have yet to watch the fourth season. The show simply no longer holds my interest. They could have simply ended it after the third season and it would have been fine. Now they're talking about a fifth season? Why?
There are changes I would've made from jump, but I'm not going to go back that far. I'm just going to take this question and imagine I'm the new showrunner for Season 5. Some of the changes I can think of:
-Focus more on exploring the Federation planets and species of the 32nd century.
-Don't throw away the Emerald Chain; they got good recurring bad guy potential.
-Finding out what happened to the Klingons, but also some other Trek species from the past.
-Give Saru his own starship, which frequently interacts with Discovery. The serialized nature of DISCO's storytelling makes it easier for them to do a big story that necessitates the involvement of two or more starships.
-Shakeup the cast more. I would have some of the DISCO cast go with Saru, but others would go to Starfleet headquarters, or across the Federation.
-Bring in new crew, from the 32nd century. They can be from familiar species, or new species, but I think it would be nicer to get more 32nd perspectives. Granted, Book, Adira, and Gray, have all been aboard Discovery, but I would like an officer, preferably Burnham's first officer to be from future Starfleet.
-Setting up a crossover involving all of the new Trek series.
Over the last three seasons, DISCO has had more impersonal big bads or challenges, and I would like them to lower the stakes a bit.
Think it’s tied for fourth favorite now. Not near the top.
3rd now, which is not bad considering what SNW has been doing in terms of causing fans to be all a giddy amongst themselves.Think it’s tied for fourth favorite now. Not near the top.
Yes, (For me) "Calypso" was and is the only Discovery mystery plot hanging in limbo that is worthy of completing.I think "Calypso" is the endpoint of the series. E
I can agree with you regarding the 'big bads' of season 1 and 2 but I think the overarching challenges of season 3 and 4 were necessary thematically for the rebuilding of the Federation. I think the idea of having the driving force for reunification and cooperation being 'man made' (for lack of a better term) galactic disasters instead of a 'ruthless new enemy™' was far more meaningful and true to the values of the Federation and Trek in general.
Based on what Michelle Paradise and Sonequa Martin-Green have said in interviews about the federation arc being completed and Season 5 being 'joyous and refreshing', I think there will definitely be a change of pace in terms of stakes.
When we're on the same page about a part of Discovery, I think that says something. There's something about leading up to "Calypso" where I think to myself, "This feels right."Yes, (For me) "Calypso" was and is the only Discovery mystery plot hanging in limbo that is worthy of completing.
That said, I dont belive that it would need to be an endpoint. It could be a new start for Discovery, on a more Sci fi, exploration, less melodramatic, future.
I have been a defender of Discovery. I am sick and tired of the hate it gets.............Saying all of this, I still think it is a very good show. It is better than Voyager and Enterprise in my eyes.
Because it's doing a lot less. It's safe and comfortable.Yes it does, but so do all shows. I can only hope it continues on its general course. Comparing the "Hate" out there. SNW has lots less.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.