It still works today, or They wouldn't be selling the crap out of it.It's a fine ship for the decade it was designed in. Not for present day.
It's just that today's producers want to put Their own mark on it.

It still works today, or They wouldn't be selling the crap out of it.It's a fine ship for the decade it was designed in. Not for present day.
To nostalgic people.They wouldn't be selling the crap out of it.
I've been giving this some thought, trying to figure out the root of my instinctual reactions, and I think it comes from the idea that there's an in-universe design of the ship, uniforms etc, and then there's what we get on screen, filtered through the limitations of their budget and technology. Or animation style.How dare creative people want to be creative? They should just recreate 60s era tech and save themselves the trouble of hiring artists.
I can't help but think of Bryan Fuller when he was initially developing DIS. He had a mandate that no starship was supposed to have rounded warp nacelles like the Enterprise. Why? Mainly because he said so, but also because he wanted DIS to have a distinct look from previous Trek shows. It was a creative choice he was free to make.It still works today, or They wouldn't be selling the crap out of it.
It's just that today's producers want to put Their own mark on it.![]()
And that's completely fair. My first Trek love will always be TOS but any changes or updates to the era take nothing of it away from that early experience to me of playing with Mego figures and making up stories. TOS stands apart. For me, nothing, no new era, or 2020 update, will take away; only add.I can't get past this. It's a straight up deal breaker for me. Either you play nice with TOS or you're not something I want to watch.
Also that they should be flatter that previous designs.I can't help but think of Bryan Fuller when he was initially developing DIS. He had a mandate that no starship was supposed to have rounded warp nacelles like the Enterprise. Why? Mainly because he said so, but also because he wanted DIS to have a distinct look from previous Trek shows. It was a creative choice he was free to make.
Yep. Fuller liked flatter starships, so flatter starships we got.Also that they should be flatter that previous designs.
Flatter starships also take better advantage of modern widescreen aspect ratios.Yep. Fuller liked flatter starships, so flatter starships we got.
To be fair the other science fiction IP with the word STAR in it hasn't changed their triangle looking ships that were first shown to the public in 1977.How dare creative people want to be creative? They should just recreate 60s era tech and save themselves the trouble of hiring artists.
Well, they did change them a bit, as the triangle ships have a noticably different model in Empire Strikes Back. But the movies make sure to show the appropriate triangle for the time period, with Rogue One going retro.To be fair the other science fiction IP with the word STAR in it hasn't changed their triangle looking ships that were first shown to the public in 1977.![]()
That's not the way.To be fair the other science fiction IP with the word STAR in it hasn't changed their triangle looking ships that were first shown to the public in 1977.![]()
According to you the self pointed hall monitorIt looks a lot better the way it is
Some people suspected the Peregrine might be a science or support vessel because of that.Just had a thought. Enterprise has red pennants. Peregrine, blue...and I don't think I'm the first to notice this.
In the TOS era of the 2250s, a Copper color was Engineering. In the 2260s it was Red.During the 2250's and 2260's, red was Operations.
Operations was most likely assigned to whoever was the Second Officer onboard during that time period.In the TOS era of the 2250s, a Copper color was Engineering. In the 2260s it was Red.
There wasn't no 'Operations' designation in the TOS era. The Helm of a Starship was manned by a Helmsman and a Navigator. There was no 'Operations' console on the Bridge of a Federation ship of that era.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.