I think it started off well but felt let down by how they escaped.
The villain's became very stupid.
The villain's became very stupid.
That makes me wonder now just which Sybok we're going to get in this show. That he consorts with space pirates isn't really a good sign though...The original version of Sybok was far more evil than the Sybok they ended up with. He used his "Unicorn" horse as a weapon and at one point one of the adversary soldiers was impaled on the horn. Our final Sybok is driven and obsessed but clearly not all that evil.
Unfortunately it was a setup, CGI effects and all, that never paid off.When they were setting up how far out they were at the beginning of this one, how they needed to drop buoys even to be able to communicate, I said "Ohhhh, I LOVE how SNW is making space big again!" What a delightful departure from Discovery's practice of having all points in the galaxy only one hour away from each other, I thought.
I think it started off well but felt let down by how they escaped.
The villain's became very stupid.
Careful. This is dangerously close to saying that representing minorities in fiction doesn' t matter.Who says the show has to be an accurate representation of society?
One of the most acclaimed episodes of TOS featured a villain (who Trek has been rehashing for decades including making him the ancestor of La'an) who took over the Enterprise after reading some technical manuals in sickbay.I hate it when the hero ship is taken over way too easily. I like La'an, but dang she looked bad in this one allowing the ship to be hijacked so very easily!
Bringing in religious fanatic Sybok at a time when real world religious tensions are a gazillion times higher than they ever were in 1989 is... well I know if Sybok wanted to find God he'd probably try to steal a time crystal (maybe from Boreth) and then time travel back two and a half thousand years to meet a certain someone on Nazareth, Earth, etc. But there's just no way they can do such an episode and not offend someone. Say for example Sybok goes back then and finds that nothing happened, then goes insane and tries to reach the center of the galaxy. Yeah, that would put the show into controversy if not immediate cancellation.
I'm one of the few that enjoy Star Trek 5 a bit, but there doesn't seem to be a way to do a prequel of Sybok's religious quest without either offending lots of people or ultimately making the arc unsatisfying (turning him into a generic Dr. Evil villain, which seems to be what they're going for judging by the last scene)
Makes it hard to get the cannon balls in!Gotta watch out for those tight cannons.
Ha, I also give it a 6, but my 6 meant "lots of weak parts but ultimately narrowly succeeds."Ugh. First flop of the season. Had to give it a 6.
If they had been able to make one of those pirates read as a specific, unique character and not just "generic buffoon type", it really could have worked.The cutesy stuff with the cooking and the mutiny plan didn't work. Going for cutesy comedy but it was bad. A then to have the cutesy bad stuff save the day for the sloppy security on the Enterprise just added insult to injury.
That other star franchise had to put up disclaimers because the Order 66 flashbacks caused a bunch of complaints even though Kenobi airing right after a school shooting was a coincidence.The show runners shouldn't worry about offending people. There is no right to not be offended, and, in fact, it can be mentally healthy to be forced to cope with opinions and things you don't agree with- that's part and parcel of being an adult.
Tell the stories you want, and the offended can either get over it, watch something else, or go scream in their safe space. Next week, maybe I'll be offended. A lot of things offend me, but I don't walk around with a chip on my shoulder about them.
Its unrealistic representation wise per the population numbers. Its not accurate at all.
Over representation of any group in movies or TV can give people a skewed version of reality in the real world. I prefer to view the world accurately. Here's a lgbtq article about that very thing.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/259571/americans-greatly-overestimate-gay-population.aspx
I wasnt talking about the show specifically. More about tv as a whole. How does Erica Ortegas present as gay? Nothing has been mentioned about her sexuality yet. With that said we need a Ortega episode or more screen time for her. She's my favorite character so far.
I believe they established her nonbinary status in pre-release material about the character.
That other star franchise had to put up disclaimers because the Order 66 flashbacks caused a bunch of complaints even though Kenobi airing right after a school shooting was a coincidence.
More of personal curiosity than any real comment but a flop is a 6?Ugh. First flop of the season. Had to give it a 6.
Indeed. Lots of things offend me, even in Trek. So what? Somehow, life goes on. It's a mystery as to how.The show runners shouldn't worry about offending people. There is no right to not be offended, and, in fact, it can be mentally healthy to be forced to cope with opinions and things you don't agree with- that's part and parcel of being an adult.
Tell the stories you want, and the offended can either get over it, watch something else, or go scream in their safe space. Next week, maybe I'll be offended. A lot of things offend me, but I don't walk around with a chip on my shoulder about them.
That's almost exactly my take as well. Getting the Enterprise back out at the edge of known space and beyond. But then T'Pring, as usual, is there. Starfleet can rescue them if they can only get the message off. Etc.When they were setting up how far out they were at the beginning of this one, how they needed to drop buoys even to be able to communicate, I said "Ohhhh, I LOVE how SNW is making space big again!" What a delightful departure from Discovery's practice of having all points in the galaxy only one hour away from each other, I thought.
Then at the end it took T'Pring 30 seconds to get there from Vulcan. It was nice while it lasted.I'm just going to tell myself a lot more time elapsed between scenes there than was suggested.
![]()
I respect the English language (including usage of articles).You're not respectful person.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.