• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds 1x01 - "Strange New Worlds"

Rate the Episode

  • 1 - Excellent

    Votes: 147 45.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 81 25.3%
  • 3

    Votes: 60 18.8%
  • 4

    Votes: 12 3.8%
  • 5

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 6

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • 7

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 8

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 10 - Terrible

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    320
  • Poll closed .
8/10 (Old Warp Scale)

Other thoughts:

One character who I found particularly notable was Chapel, who admittedly isn't much like Majel Barrett's version of the character, but still seems like a fun person. I think she's also made an impression on Spock...
The only thing I wonder about is that at one point, I swear that M'Benga refers to her as doctor. If she's a doctor, why did she serve as a nurse in TOS?

From THE MAKING OF STAR TREK (p.254):
"Christine Chapel is well-educated for her task, with a doctorate of her own in Bio-Research. (sic)"

The character sketches/biographic details in TMOST were taken from the second season Writer's Guide, and thus, reflective of the thinking in the TOS production office ca. 1967. That bit of information never made it into dialogue onscreen, so technically, isn't "canon," but the concept of Chapel having a doctorate of her own - albeit not an MD, probably a PhD or DSc - wasn't pulled out of thin air.

Later, she got her MD prior to TMP.

[Edited to fix an autocorrect-induced word substitution error.]
 
Last edited:
From THE MAKING OF STAR TREK (p.254):
"Christine Chapel is well dedicated for her task, with a doctorate of her own in Bio-Research. (sic)"

The character sketches/biographic details in TMOST were taken from the second season Writer's Guide, and thus, reflective of the thinking in the TOS production office ca. 1967. That bit of information never made it into dialogue onscreen, so technically, isn't "canon," but the concept of Chapel having a doctorate of her own - albeit not an MD, probably a PhD or DSc - wasn't pulled out of thin air.

Later, she got her MD prior to TMP.
Well thanks for this bit of info. I never read the Making of Star Trek, so I didn't know this. I did know she served in the movies as a physician.
 
I'm not sure if you're talking about Stalins great purge and i belive the 1 million deaths he caused before WWII or if there was more during WWII that he was responsible for.
Good point. Yes, his purge started during WWII and continued on, really into his death.
 
Did I wander into a TNZ thread?

One character who I found particularly notable was Chapel, who admittedly isn't much like Majel Barrett's version of the character, but still seems like a fun person. I think she's also made an impression on Spock...
The only thing I wonder about is that at one point, I swear that M'Benga refers to her as doctor. If she's a doctor, why did she serve as a nurse in TOS?

She's a doctor in a field of study but a nurse in medicine?
 
The entire subtext of the script to "Amok Time" was that Vulcans were not as they claimed, or as Spock said they were.

Sturgeon was an observant man and a good writer. What he knew, and what any anthropologist can tell you, is that every culutre has their ethos and their models and archetypes of what the "good individual" is. And few, if truly any, live up in every way to those models.

Those who are seen to do so are often lionized - they are heroes and saints. But most individuals believe themselves to be somewhere "in the ballpark" - put simply, we believe that we're good, but most of us, sometimes, fear that we are bad or insufficient in some ways. Unless we're unbalanced - megalomaniacal, narcissistic, or otherwise pathological in our view of ourselves and others so that we see ourselves as the ideal or only standard.

Here's something, though: every functioning culture allows individuals a great deal of usually unspoken, unacknowledged leeway to fall short or substantially deviate from the ideal in their everyday behavior. Were it not so, the civilization would pull itself to pieces in short order.

In "Amok Time," every individual we meet on Vulcan is something other than the image that Spock has painted for us of what it means to be Vulcan. T'Pring is duplicitous, manipulative and emotionally driven, as is Stonn - when T'Pring switches the plan on him, he has an actual emotional outburst (for a Vulcan). T'Pau, "All of Vulcan in one package," is arrogant and dishonest - there is no other reason for her to withhold from Kirk and McCoy the rather crucial information that Kirk is agreeing to participate in a duel to the death.

It's laid out pretty clearly. There are Vulcans as they say they are, and Vulcans as one can see them to be in their real behavior - same as it is with human beings.
 
The Vulcans were kind of always how ENT presented them, we just didn't see much of that behavior. Spock became the avatar for all Vulcans for a long time and so we associated his ethics and kindness with his whole species. Nope. Even TOS showed how duplicitous and savage they can be. "Amok Time" showed they don't mind changing the rules if they can find logical reasoning for their decisions and will remain beholden to rituals that quite frankly aren't terribly logical.
 
Never!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

slow_clap_citizen_kane.gif
 
She also said Spock didn’t have any siblings and no one cared about that one. :lol:
How about "the only every seven years thing was a stupid conclusion reached by fans and has never mattered worth a spit?"

Because that works.
 
I thought it was funny when Spock's alien attire was the school uniform (where are my pants?). That was a clever one.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top