I stand corrected, I went back and listened, he actually says it both ways depending on his mood.
Is not teh continuity!!!!
I stand corrected, I went back and listened, he actually says it both ways depending on his mood.
So Q would seem to NOT want fascist Earth, or why drop crew there, cuz he KNOWS they’re going to try to change things. But why go back with them and try and stop them? I don’t get what Q wants.
And how do you all seem to know what Renee will find? Did someone bts let it out? Or did I miss it? (I have missed the KEY line of dialog in the past, so I am really wondering. Also I don’t rewatch eps.
After, 8 eps, I still don’t get what went on to get them to the past and why Q and BQ are doing what they do.
So Q didn’t send them to the past. Picard did? How? Blowing up the ship? I can’t remember.
BQ doesn’t want Renee to find something on Europa, I guess. But why was Q getting in Renee’s head to assist the BQ ? Why does Q want the mission stopped? He was manipulating Soong to bump off Picard earlier. Q’s dying, but why stop a mission?
D'oh. You're absolutely right.Well Adam Soong did have that crazy solar shielding tech. I assume that the planetary shield on Confederation Earth is just that scaled up.
The "mystery box" style of the show still annoys me when I think about it. Instead of dragging out what was going on with Q for the whole season, having Q tell Picard in episode 2 that he was dying and was giving him/humanity one last trial would have worked better for me than him just speaking in riddles to Picard.
Serialisation works better the way Agents of SHIELD did it - multiple overlapping, successional story arcs running through a season - often interrelated, but always distinct - so that no single story got stretched too thin, and as each story arc reached its conclusion, the seeds of the next had already been sown ready to take over.I think part of that is how they are doing serialization of the show. They want the season to be one continuous story where the finale is the payoff to the mystery. Discovery does the same thing. They dragged on the mystery of 10-C way too long because they wanted the reveal to only happen in the finale.
In contrast, DS9 did serialization differently. It told individual self-contained stories each episode. There was just an overarching arc to them, like the Dominion war. So we got various episodes that moved the Dominion arc forward, but each episode was a self-contained story.
Personally, I think Trek should go back to self contained stories each episode. I know serialization is all the rage now (the Marvel shows on Disney+ do it too). But I don't think it really works. The main problem is that there is just not enough story to last 9 or so episodes. The Disney+ shows have the same issue as well. I think Trek would be better off telling self-contained stories. It would hopefully feel more satisfying because at the end of the episode, we could go "ok that was an interesting story with a clear beginning, middle and end".
... but I loved how he was (perhaps) a kid who saw the Vulcans from ENT's Carbon Creek when he was younger.![]()
It's a nice idea, but it sorta ignores WWIII. Unless it's that man dedicates so many resources to slower than light exploration, that World War III becomes inevitable after the complete depletion of really important stuff.
Carbon Creek took place in 1957, so if he was that kid -- who was about 12 -- Wells would be in his late 70s. Jay Karnes is only 58.
Helpful, thanks, I had forgotten the slingshot.
So Q would seem to NOT want fascist Earth, or why drop crew there, cuz he KNOWS they’re going to try to change things. But why go back with them and try and stop them? I don’t get what Q wants.
And how do you all seem to know what Renee will find? Did someone bts let it out? Or did I miss it? (I have missed the KEY line of dialog in the past, so I am really wondering. Also I don’t rewatch eps.
Personally, I think Trek should go back to self contained stories each episode. I know serialization is all the rage now (the Marvel shows on Disney+ do it too). But I don't think it really works. The main problem is that there is just not enough story to last 9 or so episodes. The Disney+ shows have the same issue as well. I think Trek would be better off telling self-contained stories. It would hopefully feel more satisfying because at the end of the episode, we could go "ok that was an interesting story with a clear beginning, middle and end".
Or perhaps the war never even takes place in the Confed timeline.
Seems a good explanation as anything for writers can't do math.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.