I liked when Saru went hard no, shut up and get back to your station.. I was begging the tv for tilly to do the same thing to those cadets.. She was to freindly..
Star Trek has literally shown Tal Shiar assassins in ST:PICARD beaming away when their assassins are about to fall to their doom and have a traumatic injury by landing on their head from falling over a set of stairs and compressing their spinal column.I didn't find this to be terrible writing. It's more of a structural problem with Star Trek where the transporter is ridiculously overpowered. In theory, the computer should be able to constantly monitor the actions of all the crew and automatically beam them away from any danger (about to be hit by phaser fire, falling down the turbo shaft chasm, about to be hit by an exploding console, etc.) Any other issues with the execution of the scene (forcefield placement, etc.) could be chalked up to Zora not being able to function properly (or maybe he was moving too fast for the transporters to lock on). And I don't think the death was "cheap" in the sense that I'm assuming they need this to continue the story of Zora's evolution (now Zora can feel guilt over letting him die, which will result in Burnham saving the day by teaching Zora how to cry).
Yup, I concur.That said, I did have some minor issues with the execution of this scene. First we get Zora releasing there's a problem with the hull and she tells Grey but doesn't want to tell Burnham / the bridge? Didn't make sense.
I fully concur, Cortez should've called it in and alerted somebody that something was wrong.Then, we cut to a scene where crew members are aware of the situation and are working on it, but they also didn't tell the bridge? Again, makes no sense.
I like it when shows like "24" show competent staff working at their jobs.Welcome to Star Trek (and fiction in general)
Cortez died because he stayed at his post. Tragically Heroic trope.Star Trek has literally shown Tal Shiar assassins in ST:PICARD beaming away when their assassins are about to fall to their doom and have a traumatic injury by landing on their head from falling over a set of stairs and compressing their spinal column.
Yup, I concur.
I fully concur, Cortez should've called it in and alerted somebody that something was wrong.
Combadges are "Hands Free", so he should be able to talk and fix at the same time.
I like it when shows like "24" show competent staff working at their jobs.
If somebody dies, it's earned. They don't die because of incompetent work place safety standards.
If there is Zora and the computer just get Zora out of there. It's a liabilityI have a different interpretation of Zora, based on what she says in the episode. She describes herself as a sentient organism in a supercomputer. When I hear someone describing Zora as the computer, it feels to me as if someone is calling me a townhome because I happen to reside in that structure. To me, there is Zora and there is the computer, and they are not the same.
The Discovery appears to have a single layer of hull material, which is strange for starships contemporary with and later starships had both an inner and outer hulls. We see this in Lower Decks with the Cerritos when they stripped off the outer hull in a recent episode.
Yup, I'm surprised they didn't give Discovery another armored layer or a Ablative layer on top of the inner hull after the refit.The Discovery appears to have a single layer of hull material, which is strange for starships contemporary with and later starships had both an inner and outer hulls. We see this in Lower Decks with the Cerritos when they stripped off the outer hull in a recent episode.
I'm assuming that you get to choose between Programmable matter on the hull, or regrowable hull, or solid metal hulls that you can fix with replicators.As for the hull I assume programmable matter ships are designed different. One issue I have is why is there still emergency forcefields when you could just have regrowable hulls
And if it doesn't work for you it doesn't work. No harm, no foul.That's fair. I assumed this was the obligatory "get to know Owo" scene with no greater objective. But if this is the beginning of an arc where she realizes she isn't cut out for command and decides to join Starfleet Academy as a swimming instructor (because she can hold her breath for a long time), I will take back what I said.
Indeed. It's a part of Trek and very rarely are deaths earned. Death is just a part of Trek.Plot armor is a hell of a thing.
Star Trek has literally shown Tal Shiar assassins in ST:PICARD beaming away when their assassins are about to fall to their doom and have a traumatic injury by landing on their head from falling over a set of stairs and compressing their spinal column.
I completely agree with all those assessments.I get that it was shown in Star Trek Picard, my point is that a computer able to react in a split second should be able to use the transporters to get any crew member out of any dangerous situation in any Trek series. It's a structural problem with the Star Trek franchise.
Just like seatbelts should be installed and the crew should always be wearing them (or at a minimum, during red alert).
They should also design consoles that don't explode which is a huge downgrade in tech considering these consoles are the future equivalent of today's keyboard and mouse, which never explode in your face.
Tech over humans makes drama.Bore Trek, a KamenBladeRider production. No jeopardy, no stakes just tech.
You just need to know how to bypass the tech and what the tech does or doesn't do.Bore Trek, a KamenBladeRider production. No jeopardy, no stakes just tech.
Narratively coherent doesn't mean boring...No, I want my fiction to be interesting and exciting. Not the boring version you always seem to push.
You just need to know how to bypass the tech and what the tech does or doesn't do.
It's not impossible to write a show that has stakes while using all the high tech gadgets in the world to it's full advantage.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.