The Kurtzmann and JJ stuff will become "true Trek" in the future when another version of Trek comes out in 20 yearsYup. Except, TMP is still true Trek, somehow.
The Kurtzmann and JJ stuff will become "true Trek" in the future when another version of Trek comes out in 20 years![]()
Hopefully this is the last round of new Trek.The Kurtzmann and JJ stuff will become "true Trek" in the future when another version of Trek comes out in 20 years![]()
Easier to accept when the positive parts are shared too.And people will accept that it’s OK to criticize the parts you don’t like. Hardly anyone bats an eye at the complaints about the TMP uniforms.
Hopefully this is the last round of new Trek.
Easier to accept when the positive parts are shared too.
TOS is the best for me. Always will be.I like Star Trek V, but I accept that most of the commentary will be negative. That’s OK, and it doesn’t affect my enjoyment one whit. I can enjoy it despite its flaws.
As a TOS fan, it’s weird to see what seem like substantial (and growing) chunks of fandom who have never watched the original series and can’t bring themselves to sit through it. Many don’t have a kind word for it, or they disparage it, often baselessly, to defend their preferred Trek. But, hey, their loss. That’s a natural effect of such a long-running franchise: Most fans will have a particular fondness for whatever series made them Trek fans, and everything else will be second best or not my Star Trek. That will be the case for Discovery, too, I’m sure.
No, they don't. It's a story like any other. All a prequel requires is taking place prior to a previous installment. It has no obligation to fill in the blanks.It was billed as a prequel to TOS. Prequels require an overarching structure more than sequels, or fandom will complain about canon.
Because then it becomes a game of connect the dots and not a story.why not try to address all of those loose threads?
what????I guess I can understand the need to make the Klingons more alien, but IMHO this is one thing that really was unnecessary. I mean, I realize that shitting all over the Rick Berman era is the new cool thing in Trek, but come on.
That's not what happened.mean, I realize that shitting all over the Rick Berman era is the new cool thing in Trek, but come on.
I doubt they had the Berman Klingons in their sites when doing the revamp.Sorry, I think I overreacted. I shoulda just said "all over the Berman era Klingons".
srsly, it really does look like they went out of their way to make the DSC Klingons look as un-Bermanish as they could. They didn't just make a couple of tweaks, it looks almost like a whole new species. I didn't think they looked Klingon AT ALL.
But as I said, at least there's no elongated heads anymore.
Indeed. And even within Trek there is room for artistic exploration. Which is what was done.I doubt they had the Berman Klingons in their sites when doing the revamp.
They have bumpy foreheads, like bladed weapons and drone on about being Klingon. What's more Klingon than that?
It was Bryan Fuller's directive to redesign the Klingons, not Kurtzman's. Fuller wanted them to be more alien looking for some reason.It’s so odd, because JJ’s Bad Robot production company perfected the look in Into Darkness. Kurtzmam (a JJ acolyte and co-writer on 2 of the Kelvin movies) with his production company Secret Hideout altered the look so much for a pre-TOS and post-ENT show. Why?
It doesn't need an explanation, just like how the TMP Klingon redesign didn't need one for 26 years.The problem was that the DIS team never explained why the Klingons looked that way
There was never an explanation why in Season 2 itself, only comments from the make up designer and actors. The explanation didn't even originate from the writers, it came from Glen Hatrick, the makeup designer.then Season 2 retconned the Baldness in a half assed but understandable way.
They didn't completely, there were still a few of them in Season 2.At least they dropped the one thing I hated MOST about the DSC Klingons - the elongated heads.
Fuller is why.Why?
Bryan Fuller?Let us appreciate the Klingons through the ages.
ENT
Klaang
![]()
Antaak
![]()
Antaak Ridgless
![]()
TOS
Kor
![]()
Koloth
![]()
Korax
![]()
Kras
![]()
Krell
![]()
Kang
![]()
Kruge
![]()
Chang
![]()
Azetbur
![]()
TNG-DS9-VOY
Worf and the Klingons behind him
![]()
![]()
![]()
K'Ehleyr: Half Human
![]()
B'Elanna: Half Human
![]()
Kelvin Era
![]()
Discovery
![]()
![]()
My initial response to the DSC Klingons hasn’t changed. They look like they were left in the oven too long and overcooked.
It’s so odd, because JJ’s Bad Robot production company perfected the look in Into Darkness. Kurtzmam (a JJ acolyte and co-writer on 2 of the Kelvin movies) with his production company Secret Hideout altered the look so much for a pre-TOS and post-ENT show. Why?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.