Love what you're doing with that shuttlebay and corridors!
Looking damn cool
Yeah, that moment you're starting populating a ship's interior and realise hot damn, that's a lot of ground to cover. And I even had that with a smaller science vessel. This? This is a bona fide cruiser. That's a whole lot more...Also, I'm starting to realise just how much space I've got to fill... :s
...with lots of turboshafts and large storage tanks, plus large equipment areas...
Yeah, that moment you're starting populating a ship's interior and realise hot damn, that's a lot of ground to cover. And I even had that with a smaller science vessel. This? This is a bona fide cruiser. That's a whole lot more...
With a round saucer it's easier, but yeah, you'll find that windows in relation to the crew quarters vary every. sinle. deck. I don't know how other software handles recurring objects, but in SketchUp I create components out of the crew quarters and then have the shape of the window as an extruded object that I copy together with my components. The components stay the same, the extruded part gets cut off onto the hull.
Wow! Your ship really is spacious, @Johnny. I don't think I've ever seen this type of interior view of other ships, so I'm glad you're sharing these work-in-progress images. Normally, I find it difficult to conceive of just how much space there is inside starships - an MSD-style cutaway, or interior sets really don't sell the sheer volume that's there.![]()
curious @Johnny that you chose the john eaves enterprise E style nacelles rather than extrapolate on the probert C / D lineage. maybe i'm alone on this but i always thought that was a misstep for eaves.
But i really have a soft spot for the ambassador class, think that's where my circular saucer comes from.
no kidding! when i tell my trek buddies that i prefer ambassador to galaxy, they call blaspheme. i have the eaglemoss XL models for A through D, and although it bothers me that they are all roughly the same length (about 10.5") rather than being proportional to one another, the size and feel of the enterprise C model is perfect.
when you see them drawn alongside each other like in the TNG technical manual or the enterprise owners' workshop manual it's just crazy how much larger the D is to the TOS ship. i've always wanted to be able to show that scale on my bookshelf.That is true geek-dom! "My models aren't proportional to each other!" Love it!
when you see them drawn alongside each other like in the TNG technical manual or the enterprise owners' workshop manual it's just crazy how much larger the D is to the TOS ship. i've always wanted to be able to show that scale on my bookshelf.
sidenote: the TMP refit (including ships like the reliant and the bozeman) is my favorite trek design era of all time. nothing can beat those nacelles in my eyes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.