Capitalism stops for no one. Gene would be proud.
That much is certain. The fact that he, as a writer, created the script which introduced these characters means that he'd be getting paid.

Capitalism stops for no one. Gene would be proud.
That much is certain. The fact that he, as a writer, created the script which introduced these characters means that he'd be getting paid.![]()
Overshadow????? In what way?My point exactly! Why they have this need to try to overshadow TOS is beyond me!!!
JB
I think that the last scene featuring him in STD was intended to suggest that he'd put his emotional ways behind him.
Overshadow????? In what way?
Yep. There is a compulsion today to have characters that are somehow broken so the multitudes in the audience who feel broken can relate and thus identify with the characters more.Please no. Just be a crew and go have adventures that are thought-provoking, human, and have dilemmas where I truly don't know what is going to happen next. I am so tired of anxty, moody, broody, broken. Yes TOS encountered some dark crap. I've been there from the birth, and it is my first (really only) Trek love. But the people were essentially functional. No more breakdowns or sibling love/hates or . . . ok, I'm done.
All nu-Trek so far has moved past me. But then, most things I just don't find to be that good. PIC was such a disappointment. I thought it would be GOOD-good, not just Star Trek-ok-good. Kind of like how I'm finding DS9 on 2nd rewatch. Has some really good-for-Trek moments, but nowhere near the best in TV. Which I think TOS did approach in the mid 60s. Intelligent writing from real writers, often very good dialog, consistent characters compared to other genre shows . . . yap yap yap, old man howling at the moon . . . I'll just stop. I have hope for Pike, though. Fool me thrice, shame on me, though.
They invented a character so her loss would be so overwhelming it would drive Spock to seek Kolihnar--it just had to be explained.
That was probably me.Who called cbstrek corporate fan fiction upthread? Man, that is spot ON! TNG shore looks original. GR didn't want Klingons or Rommies as bad guys, even, right?
That much is certain. The fact that he, as a writer, created the script which introduced these characters means that he'd be getting paid.![]()
I would imagine we will see lots of replaying of Spock's character arc in Strange New Worlds. But this Spock isn't Nimoy's, or Fontana's, or Roddenberry's Spock, he is a Spock for a new generation of viewers and that is how I'll treat the character. Broad strokes will be roughly the same, the details will be different.
That's pretty much a given I think and it is something I can live with. What I fear is some inexplicable radical change to Spock that ruins the character and doesn't make any sense, which given SNW is made by the same people who made Discovery isn't beyond the realms of possibility.
Truth.But whatever they do, doesn’t ruin TOS Spock for me. TOS is in a class by itself.
Probably not, no. But I wish they'd realize that doing that loses all shock value if it happens constantly.I don't think the writers have the self-control to not give us emotional Spock.
Except for all those times he loses his temper and starts wailing on the nearest available person. Which happened about once per movie, IIRC.Kelvin Timeline Spock grew up in a different timeline after around his third birthday so Quinto's Spock being different in temperament from both Nimoy's and Peck's doesn't bother me at all. He's still sufficiently Vulcan and Spock-like.
I enjoy flawed heroes with feet of clay that I can identify with, and also I enjoy larger than life heroes who are aspirational. Depends on my mood and what I want out of a particular piece of fiction. I just have trouble with it when people try to transform a hero of one type into the other.There is a compulsion today to have characters that are somehow broken so the multitudes in the audience who feel broken can relate and thus identify with the characters more.
Bullshit.
"Away team" is a particular bugaboo of mine and it totally throws me out of the story whenever I hear in the context of a TOS era story. But as far as I could tell, DSC never made that error. (Unfortunately, I can't use Star Trek Script Search to confirm it, but I don't recall noticing it.)They'll get the continuity and vernacular of the 23rd century wrong- characters will say things like "away team" or "replicator" or some other thing that has no impact on the storytelling whatsoever but will annoy me nonetheless... but I know that going in.
All of Star Trek is fan fiction of one kind or another. Pretty much everyone who's written Trek since the mid 80s was a fan to some degree. It's just that some fans have managed to get their ST fan fiction professionally produced or published.Who called cbstrek corporate fan fiction upthread? Man, that is spot ON!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.