• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers On Seven and sexuality

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Guy Gardener said:
If a lesbian makes love to a chair, it's lesbian sex.

Seven had less regard for Kim than a chair.

She will never have more regard for Kim than any piece of furniture.

Kim's sexuality and gender is meaningless to Seven.

He is nothing.

Look, I was just trying to say "not-necessarily-non-heterosexual penetrative intercourse" quickly, so I'm not married to the term "lesbian sex".

She's too Borg to receive a penis anywhere you would expect to put a penis, but Kim is not, and it wouldn't be hard for her to find something like a penis in the mess, to put inside him.

Sex is complex.

First off the orifices actually have to be there. The Borg may have removed them, or they've each just sunk into her and sealed up from never having ever been used or cleaned in 26 years.

Lubrication.

Local responses to stimulus.

Body wide responses to stimulus.

Orgasm.

Which either might be impossible with a cybernetic brain, or cause a seizure.

Meanwhile I've heard it speculated that in the beginning under that silver suit, she doesn't have any epidermis yet.
Click to expand...
4Qzn8mi.jpg
 
Guy Gardener said:
If a lesbian makes love to a chair, it's lesbian sex.

Seven had less regard for Kim than a chair.

She will never have more regard for Kim than any piece of furniture.

Kim's sexuality and gender is meaningless to Seven.

He is nothing.

Look, I was just trying to say "not-necessarily-non-heterosexual penetrative intercourse" quickly, so I'm not married to the term "lesbian sex".

She's too Borg to receive a penis anywhere you would expect to put a penis, but Kim is not, and it wouldn't be hard for her to find something like a penis in the mess, to put inside him.

Sex is complex.

First off the orifices actually have to be there. The Borg may have removed them, or they've each just sunk into her and sealed up from never having ever been used or cleaned in 26 years.

Lubrication.

Local responses to stimulus.

Body wide responses to stimulus.

Orgasm.

Which either might be impossible with a cybernetic brain, or cause a seizure.

Meanwhile I've heard it speculated that in the beginning under that silver suit, she doesn't have any epidermis yet.
Click to expand...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Alright...this has gone far enough. @Guy Gardener , and anyone who might be inclined to argue or play along with him...the bizarre discussion of Seven's sex organs and potential hookup with Harry Kim ends NOW. I'm temporarily closing the thread so everyone has a chance to read this and let it sink in. If the discussion continues after I reopen it, action will be taken.
 
cooleddie74 said:
"Crappy"?

Yeah, Riker's armada was lazy copy-and-paste but the CGI in Seaaon 1 was "crappy"? Disappointing choices = / = crappy.
Click to expand...

It was bad. The final episode looks so rushed and the Starfleet Armada looks terrible. I've seen better fan made amateur effect on YouTube. I can't believe this was a professional production. Once scene at the planet they went to rescue Maddox they actually used miniature Christmas lights adorned on the ceiling and walls. It looked like something you would see on a cheap soap opera. The miniature light thing is big with set directors today and is a lazy way to make sets supposedly pop. Lol
 
Pubert said:
It was bad. The final episode looks so rushed and the Starfleet Armada looks terrible. I've seen better fan made amateur effect on YouTube. I can't believe this was a professional production. Once scene at the planet they went to rescue Maddox they actually used miniature Christmas lights adorned on the ceiling and walls. It looked like something you would see on a cheap soap opera. The miniature light thing is big with set directors today and is a lazy way to make sets supposedly pop. Lol
Click to expand...

I imagine if you looked into it, a lot of sets and props are reworked ordinary objects, to save time and cost, which makes sense. I for one had no issues with the look of Picard.
 
Pubert said:
It was bad. The final episode looks so rushed and the Starfleet Armada looks terrible. I've seen better fan made amateur effect on YouTube. I can't believe this was a professional production. Once scene at the planet they went to rescue Maddox they actually used miniature Christmas lights adorned on the ceiling and walls. It looked like something you would see on a cheap soap opera. The miniature light thing is big with set directors today and is a lazy way to make sets supposedly pop. Lol
Click to expand...
Cost cutting measures are not new to TV production, especially Star Trek. Looking at you TOS.

The armada may be all the same ship but that doesn't make it terrible.

Seriously, at this point I think people just need a reason to complain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
If Kes stayed aboard Voyager during Season 4, how well would she and Seven get along?
Replies
5
Views
252
WarpTenLizard
WarpTenLizard
B
Is Kathryn Janeway a good representation of a Federation human?
Replies
8
Views
477
Mr. Friscus
M
B
Human małe/Vulcan female romantic relationships
Replies
6
Views
459
Will The Serious
Will The Serious
Admiral Jean-Luc Picard
  • Locked
S1 vs. S2 vs. S3 (comparing seasons)
14 15 16
Replies
301
Views
13K
The Old Mixer
The Old Mixer
M
Time Travel Challenge: As Long As We're Here
Replies
0
Views
100
MikeJaffa
M
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top