That’s 4 by my count
What were those? The one in Discovery is the only other one that comes to mind.
It took my second watch through to realize Soji’s new co-worker was a trill. Her spots are really hard to see.
I suspect he dragged her down with him...possibly rescuing some Romulans against orders. Hence the line from the trailers, "Another top secret rescue mission?"We'll find out soon enough, but I wonder what happened between Musiker and Picard. I figured she might be pissed off that he went to the Vineyard and "gave up". But she's familiar with the vintages of the Chateau. "Is that the '86?" So something more must've happened.
Tilly: That's so fucking cool!
Stamets: It is fucking cool.
Clancy: Fuking hubris!
Leah Brahams: So you're the one who's fouled up my engines.
The way Leah says it, that counts as an honorary. We know what she really would've said if the censors would've allowed it.
Amazon subtitles didn't say "feckers"Cheeky feckers.
Ah, so a new spin on canon debate. What's more canon, verbal pronunciation or written subtitlesNo, they didn't. I don't think they cared about the pronunciation difference.
That clock reflection was done on purpose.
It was another representation of Picard getting old and him realizing it.
It's called 'setting up the scene' with Dramatic License.
![]()
Iconic ship to most peopleWhilst I hate large scale prominent retcons (like radically changing the appearance of the most iconic Trek ship) I'm super fine with retconning throwaway details such as dates, exact tech specs etc. For example the whole Eugenics War timeline doesn't work anyway, all things stated about it on screen simply cannot be true, so we might as well ignore the 1990s reference. Then all the other facts fit, the EW being the same as WWWIII, and Trek can still remain as 'our future.'
One thing I am not a huge fan of is that they are using so much implied knowledge from things established in Picard: Countdown that we're being forced to get the comic to understand everything. Also they don't mention this fact in the show anywhere so if it weren't for you guys I'd have no idea the comic was even there, and was required reading to understand half the main characters.
I really don't think the comic is at all required in order to understand the show.
It was alright. But Star Trek isn't Blade Runner.Not really. It’s perfectly possible to maintain continuity with an older imagined version. And the move is towards that, not away from it. Blade Runner 2049 did exactly the same thing, and did not suffer for it.
I agree, except I've run into people who haven't read the comic who are upset for some reason that Picard has two Tal Shiar agents working on his vineyard.
me too - i've never seen those comics and i don't intent toI really don't think the comic is at all required in order to understand the show.
....
That was one of the first pictures they released months ago
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.