• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Worst command decisions by Captain James T. Kirk

And Kirk managed more ship takeovers in three years than Picard in his seven years. If losing your ship to a takeover was a competition, then Kirk wins!

And add in: a love-struck teenager; a happy irishman; a flamboyant englishman-wannabe; mind-pulsing bigheads; a 20th century superman; mutiny via spores; and I'm still in Season 1. Kirk's wins. :techman:

Amen dude :techman:
 
He was far too trusting of the Reliant's silent approach in The Wrath of Khan. What an absolutely dreadful error. And it not only cost many lives, but also caused the death of Mr. Spock.
That dreadful error ultimately ended up saving the entire planet Earth.

Think about it. If Spock isn't killed after Khan sets off the Genesis Device, then Spock doesn't implant his katra into Dr. McCoy, Kirk & crew don't steal the Enterprise to take McCoy back to the Genesis Planet. So therefore, Kirk and his crew aren't exiled to Vulcan for three months, and they aren't on their way back to Earth in a captured Klingon Bird of Prey when the Whale Probe starts wreaking havoc on Earth. Then there's no resurrected Spock to inspire Kirk to travel back in time to retrieve humpback whales from the past, and Earth dies. There's literally no other set of people who could've done it under that set of circumstances.
But I'd bet anything that since Khan had committed a severe crime, he would have to be brought to trial by the Starfleet legal system on a starbase. For Kirk to hold his own little court and render his own judgement, without authorization from Starfleet... seems out of character for Kirk.
Kirk being a Starship Captain WAS the authorization from Starfleet.

Conversations with Starfleet HQ in the TOS era weren't the everyday events that they were on TNG and beyond. Sometimes Kirk was in communications range, sometimes he wasn't. And in those circumstances, Kirk was the representative of Federation law in his territory and was authorized to act on behalf of the Federation.

Kirk didn't go rogue in "Space Seed." Khan and McGivers' hearing at the end was an official Starfleet function. That's why they're in dress uniforms, there's the ceremonial bell, and Uhura is recording the proceedings. McCoy even says that Kirk has the authority to drop all the charges. Bones just didn't think it was a wise decision (What else is new?).
UHURA: Record tapes engaged and ready, Captain.
KIRK: This hearing is now in session. Under the authority vested in me by Starfleet Command, I declare all charges and specifications in this matter have been dropped.
MCCOY: Jim. Agreed you have the authority--
Yes, Kirk showed questionable judgement allowing Khan unfettered access to the Enterprise's record tapes, but he was completely within his authority to drop the charges and put them on Ceti Alpha V. The person who really screwed up was whoever in Starfleet Command forgot to ever check up on Khan or even explore the Ceti Alpha system again. But you can hardly blame Kirk for that.
You got a super-juiced up half-alien robot probe flying around that destroys planets because they ain't perfect, and the only thing keeping it from wiping out your ship is that it thinks you made it and that therefore you're perfect. So whaddya do? Yell at it , "Well I'm an imperfect being and I created you!!! How do you like them apples, huh??"
It worked, didn't it?
 
How many times did Archer have his ship boarded? The Suliban seemed to have the keys to the front door. And the Borg were there. And how did Daniels get on board in the first place?
 
Kirk's way of commanding his ship made him about the only Captain who ever returned from the deep space voyage!!! So I'd say that right or wrong he did what he did to get his crew through the troubles of that episode! Later on people could nitpick this or that and add in some cowboy diplomacy but his adventures were the required reading I'm sure! :techman:
JB
 
I guess tea-sipping Picard, who had been kidnapped (more than once), tortured, converted into a Borg, had no true defense against Q and had his ship taken over how many times?

To be fair, Picard's ship was bigger and consequently harder to take over.

That's how that works...right?

Unless you're two rent a wreck BoPs full of Ferengis.

I'll go out on a limb and say Picard's Enterprise was destroyed more often than Kirk's.
 
In “Space Seed”, Kirk allows Khan and his crew, along with an Enterprise crewperson, to gain access to an entire planet for their own purposes. After seeing Khan in action, he should have gathered what a cruel power-hungry person Khan was, and put him and his followers somewhere they could be monitored. This is one time Kirk’s decision came back to haunt him.
 
He knew after a chat with Spock that to put Khan and his crew into a federation re-education centre would probably cause more trouble than to just let them go somewhere where they could do no harm!
JB
 
Last edited:
I would say not killing Gary Mitchell while it was still easy - either give him a fentantyl shot while he's asleep or vaporize him while he's asleep. Kirk's Hamlet-like proscrastination cost the life Kelso, almost got himself killed and put the entire crew at risk.
 
I would say not killing Gary Mitchell while it was still easy - either give him a fentantyl shot while he's asleep or vaporize him while he's asleep. Kirk's Hamlet-like proscrastination cost the life Kelso, almost got himself killed and put the entire crew at risk.
"Risk. Risk is our business. That's what the starship is all about. That's why we're aboard her." - Kirk, Return to Tomorrow.

Kirk didn't have a crystal ball to scry the future. At the time, no one has been hurt, and Gary, Kirk's best friend, was still alive. Once Gary killed someone, Kirk put him in a hole.
 
"Risk. Risk is our business. That's what the starship is all about. That's why we're aboard her." - Kirk, Return to Tomorrow.

Kirk didn't have a crystal ball to scry the future. At the time, no one has been hurt, and Gary, Kirk's best friend, was still alive. Once Gary killed someone, Kirk put him in a hole.

But Spock had already given Kirk the most logical, sensible advice (no matter how painful): kill Gary Mitchell while you still can. He said something like (paraphrashing), "The doctor feels emotionally, but I know from logic." Gary Mitchell's powers and arrogance were multiplying so fast anyone could see that he would become a life-threatening problem sooner or later.
 
Requesting Gary be assigned to his ship in the first place as the bad command decision.
Yes, having trusted people in your command staff is bad. Based on this line of reasoning, Kirk should have transferred his entire command staff off the ship long before STII: The Wrath of Khan.
But Spock had already given Kirk the most logical, sensible advice (no matter how painful): kill Gary Mitchell while you still can. He said something like (paraphrashing), "The doctor feels emotionally, but I know from logic."
Huh? Since when did Kirk do the logical thing. While Spock was suggesting chess and Checkmate, Kirk was playing Poker and bluffing in The Corbomite Maneuver. Remember the odds of success dialog with Spock in Errand of Mercy? No, Kirk doesn't believe in a no-win scenario.

Spock, following correct logical decisions in The Galileo Seven, repeatively failed.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top