Now as an adult -- well for some time now -- well, ok, since my twenties, I knew TOS wasn't too likely, science-wise. But it had a science-y veneer. And I wasn't that into science, but as a "smart kid" they talked smart talk on tv, so I loved it. They gave it the ol' college try. The writers/showrunners had come of age in the pulp era and were creating the show right after the 50s Bradbury/Sturgeon golden age. It was a form of science fiction, and I was reading Analog as a kid. The god-like beings are a step into fantasy, but there was usually a nod to evolution and psionic capabilities which were fact then.
I disliked when DS9 veered into pah wraiths and people shooting force-lightning out of their arms. That's at least aesthetically gettin into fantasy. I'm a sci-fi kid all growed up and simply don't like that. That is one beef about DSC, that it is future and techy and spaceships and all, but with, yes, the magic mushrooms, and time crystals, and now the castle of mordor or whatever, it feels like it's got a half a foot in fantasy. More than any Trek incarnation has since late DS9.
Yes, I know, I can hear the yeah-buts already, and yes, every series had its weirder eps and moments, but I'm just sayin' how DSC feels. Like this time suit that can also go anywhere, not be noticed, but sometimes it's crazy-noticeable, and it moved a church out of World War III. I can hear Roddenberry's or Justman's memos in my head, questioning . . . wait . . . how did . . . what now? So thanks, all for catayzing my thoughts on this, that DSC seems a little OK-er with being a bit more fantastical. I mean, TOS coulda called 'em SPACE CRYSTALS, or WARP CRYSTALS, but no, they went the extra mile and made a mineral-y sounding name for this nerdy 70s kid. Thanks, GR. I dig your vision. We reach, in other words!
For a whole lot of youse, DSC's being ok with being just a bit less sciency-feeling (Tilly's outbursts about science aside) and a bit more fantasy-esque is either ok, or a good thing. (Dare I say a God Thing? A little GR humor there.) ("Very little, ensign.") And it's not at all a deal breaker for me. Just not how I'd prefer it. I'd like my nonsense to look and sound more plausible, please! Y M M V and that's ok.
Ok, start telling me how wrong I am . . .