Fun fact: In "WNMHGB", the transporter platform was not the glass plate that has existed in all incarnations since "The Man Trap", but a concave grille, that looked kind-of dangerous to stand on:Yeah I doubt the lenses were the exact lenses used in the TOS transporter. I believe this rumor originated from “The Art of Star Trek” in which the books states that they’re the same lenses, when they probably just meant the same type of lens.
I’ve heard that a good bit of information in that book is wrong or misleading, so I tend to scrutinize any of the information Inside.
They also appear next to the Phaser Charging panel:Hey Donny, did you deliberately leave out the physical push-buttons next to the "torpedo" arming panel, is per my study below?
![]()
Because you can see them in this framegrab:![]()
...or are they there and I'm just not seeing them?
Fun fact: In "WNMHGB", the transporter platform was not the glass plate that has existed in all incarnations since "The Man Trap", but a concave grille, that looked kind-of dangerous to stand on:
View attachment 8218
No, the Fresnel lenses were indeed present in the WNMHGB transporter room. My guess is they may have been experimenting with other things but settled on the lenses for the transporter pads. I reviewed the screencaps and they WERE present.
I am inclined to agree that they used the same type of lens and not the original lenses themselves.
Wow... I knew they used plastic in a lot of the bridge construction, but this over-lit photo makes it look really plasticky.
Hey, @Maurice....I too couldn't decipher what the missing text was via screencaps, so I made up some of my own. However, I just found this photostat image (among a ton of other ones) over in the archives at the TMP Appreciation Society on Facebook which solves the mystery. I'll be updating my graphic accordingly:
I've never seen that there. There's such a high noise to signal ratio. I guess I'll have to do a deep dive.Hey, @Maurice....I too couldn't decipher what the missing text was via screencaps, so I made up some of my own. However, I just found this photostat image (among a ton of other ones) over in the archives at the TMP Appreciation Society on Facebook which solves the mystery. I'll be updating my graphic accordingly:
![]()
I was just scrolling through all the images posted there. And yes, I agree with you on that one!I've never seen that there. There's such a high noise to signal ratio. I guess I'll have to do a deep dive.
I dunno. You'd be surprised at how many people refuse to acknowledge any flaws in a film...I will not do the Book of the Face. But a TMP Appreciation Society? Tempting...
Wow... I knew they used plastic in a lot of the bridge construction, but this over-lit photo makes it look really plasticky.
I dunno. You'd be surprised at how many people refuse to acknowledge any flaws in a film...![]()
I had a feeling someone would make that jokeSURELY you're not suggesting TMP has FLAWS, are you?!?![]()
Now it's on. I cannot argue on pacing. (That would be that "flaw" thingy.) But the TMP uniforms are Star Trek's absolute best. And you know what? The admiral uniform isn't even in my top 3!The only thing wrong with TMP is that there's not enough of it. I could really use a few more scenes of people staring at the viewscreen. And the uniforms don't look enough like pajamas.
They look very comfortable. Their colors are a bit muted but anything else wouldn't match the movie's look at all.Now it's on. I cannot argue on pacing. (That would be that "flaw" thingy.) But the TMP uniforms are Star Trek's absolute best. And you know what? The admiral uniform isn't even in my top 3!
I was never a fan of the unis being monochromatic, but that dislike extends beyond TMP.They look very comfortable. Their colors are a bit muted but anything else wouldn't match the movie's look at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.