Me neither.But I don't buy that this was the plan all along.
I have no doubt it was done solely to save face.
Me neither.But I don't buy that this was the plan all along.
Hmmnnn....
So much to take in, a bit overwhelming.
I'm going with a 5 after the first viewing...
It'll probably go up with each future viewing as I am able to ingest what I've seen more clearly.
There's nothing in this episode I don't like, it's just very convoluted in my head at the moment.
![]()
They wanted a scene to express true love. If they'd just added one of them saying 'to blave' to the tear thing it would be true love or a poker game.Me neither.
I have no doubt it was done solely to save face.
Human meat tastes like pork, not beef.Prime Lorca will show up at the next dinner Georgiou has with Burnham.
Burnham: This is odd tasting beef.
Georgiou: It's Prime Lorca Goulash.
Burnham: ?
Georgiou: What, you don't eat the Kelpians here.
I think that's been the case all season. The stories have been very good, but the storytelling -- the presentation and execution of the story as a TV show -- has been lacking.I felt like the idea for the episode was better than the episode turned out to be.
Tilly was crying and leaning into Michael's arms at the end due to the complete and overwhelming emotions from the whole ordeal.My least favorite episode so far. 7/10 for me and that includes 2 points for bringing back Culber.
I felt like the idea for the episode was better than the episode turned out to be.
I hope we don't see May again (I expect we will) and the loss Tilly felt at their separation made no sense given her reaction to May up to that point.
I wouldn't mind a little less monologuing from Burnham too.
I love Discovery but I have no love for that episode.
Possibly, but she does tell May that she "feels the same way" when May talks about how much she means to her. It makes sense for May, but Tilly only knew she wasn't an hallucination for about five minutes before Stamets pulled the blob out of her.Tilly was crying and leaning into Michael's arms at the end due to the complete and overwhelming emotions from the whole ordeal.
Not specifically because of May being gone
Maybe Tilly's like me and becomes emotionally attached to people quickly. In this case, it would seem to be much easier for Tilly to see both her friend May and the spore person in the same body, and that probably helps it along.Possibly, but she does tell May that she "feels the same way" when May talks about how much she means to her. It makes sense for May, but Tilly only knew she wasn't an hallucination for about five minutes before Stamets pulled the blob out of her.
Maybe Tilly's like me and becomes emotionally attached to people quickly. In this case, it would seem to be much easier for Tilly to see both her friend May and the spore person in the same body, and that probably helps it along.
That's how I took it as well; especially as the last three episodes apparently happened in a relatively short timeframe. She probably didn't have any time to process anything that has happened yet, especially with this episode's emotional roller coaster culminating in Hugh's resurrection added to the mix, so I saw her tears as cathartic. Then again, it was all subtext, possibly unintended, and I admit it could've been presented in a much clearer way. At least she didn't have any lines in the last scene with Burnham as far as I remember, so she doesn't outright admit she's crying over May, even if their goodbye gives off that impression.Tilly was crying and leaning into Michael's arms at the end due to the complete and overwhelming emotions from the whole ordeal.
Not specifically because of May being gone.
(which I think, is the first time Star Trek has ever dealt with PTSD on such an emotionally personal level)
At least that is what I got out of that scene.
I have to believe the writers know that Section 31 isn't supposed to be this visible, and that instead they're building up to something, perhaps something so terrible, that forces the organization to go underground and erase all record of their existence .
their existence would help explain events like the Hansen mission and how the Federation knew of certain species years or even decades before Starfleet would.
Wouldn't surprise me if a major part of the new S31 show is following Leland and his crew helping out but no one ever realising it, which would fit in well with what we saw of Sloan in DS9, playing by the rules is all well and good as long as your opponents do the same
This is exactly what I want to see from the S31 show. Maybe not every episode, but lots of juicy pokes at canon and showing ways that the organization both caused and/or cleaned up after many of the wildest calamities Kirk and company stumbled across. Something like Person of Interest meets Quantum Leap but with Bad Guys™.If Section 31 had shadowed Kirk's five- year mission, then maybe a lot of pointless deaths could have been averted.
The only aspect I do find a little overdone at times is the monologue overkill by Burnham as we got quite a lot in this episode, don't get me wrong it has always been an aspect of Star Trek
It hasn't bothered me for the most part but the ending speech in this episode was particularly egregious; putting a rather large bow on things to the point that it maybe feels a little overblown? The introductory speeches are nice though.Burnham's monologue's, well Kirk used to monologue with his Captain's logs so what's the difference?
It would be really terrifying if they actually had planned a resurrection story this stupid from the get go
I don't buy that this was the plan all along.
https://www.inverse.com/article/40188-star-trekOn Thursday, GLAAD issued a statement in support of the latest Discovery storylines, including the death of Culber. In a public statement, GLAAD spokesperson Nick Adams said: “GLAAD is mourning … the death of a beloved groundbreaking character…but death is not always final in the Star Trek universe, and we know the producers plan to continue exploring and telling Stamets and Culber’s epic love story.”
She turned out to be evil in the last season already.
No, she eventually realized she was wrong and backed down.
This is why we continue to get stories (in all media, not just Trek) about groups like Section 31 - because people just can't agree on what is a point-of-no-return or event horizon for what it means to be truly evil.Too little, too late. She approved an genocide.
Spouses that identify as male are husbands. Spouses that identify as female are wives. Period (unless of course they refer to each other as partners, etc). Don't dig this hole too deep.Maybe they should really consider accept being wives and perhaps look up the etymology/meaning of husbandry for instance to understand why, IMHO. Wife also has an eymology/meanings as well if they are looking to understand the words they are using.
bUt sTaR TrEk hAs tO MaKe sEnSe aNd bE CoNsIsTeNt oR It sUcKs aNd i hAtE ItThe real reason for all these "But why didn't they mention that before?" queries is that "well, they hadn't invented that yet." Which is, honestly, just the nature of the beast.
bUt dIsCoVeRy hAs tHe wOrSt sCiEnCe iN AlL Of tReKBut don't ask me about the Nexus. I've been trying to work that one out for 25 years.![]()
I tend to think it's because of Tilly's best qualities as a TOS human and as a Starfleet officer; she only flips after May tells her that there's a problem. She's still mad as hell, and understandably so, but her quest for knowledge can't let her completely deny the request. There's also the coercion aspect, but whateverI still feel that Tilly's transition from May's hostage to May's bestie happened a little quickly, but I'll see if my opinion of that changes when I rewatch the episode.
As I recall, one of the points of TOS was that humanity has survived and progressed despite being a half-savage child race with a long way to go.
"We're human beings with the blood of a million savage years on our hands, but we can stop it. We can admit that we're killers, but we're not going to kill today."
there's a long way from that to "officially sanctioned genocide squad".
I want to point out that the genocidal Section 31 we saw during the Deep Space Nine era may not (for various possible reasons) have all the same tendencies and characteristics as the Section 31 we will see during the Discovery era.
In other words, LET THE STORY FINISH before picking nits. Again, this is serialized television WITH a spinoff in the works. What we are seeing is not everything we are meant to see. Yet.Producers are aware of the discrepancy with 24th century Section 31 and may even have a plan to show how Section 31 goes underground:
Well, there's kind of a reason I said that maybe Tilly was more like me, because that's how I am. I can make strong, fast, and deep connections with people.Tilly was hostile to May and rightly so until this episode. Then quite suddenly May is her best friend who giving up her link to is deeply upsetting for her.
I can guess I can blame the mushrooms.
I believe that, while the Mycelial network is a large, sentient organism, it gets its sentience from all of the individual organisms. It would be like recognizing the earth is alive, and sentient, but then wondering why one of the natives you're trying to communicate with has run away from you screaming.It's also annoying to me that having access to Tilly's memories May should have known explaining what was happening and asking for help would have been more likely to get her what she wanted than kidnapping a Starfleet Officer.
I don't really understand why the newtwork rebuilt Culber just to try and eat him after bringing him back.
I think she was hostile towards the idea that she was seeing hallucinations, and what "seeing things" means to her sanity and thus her career. I felt Tilly was at first frustrated that she thought she was loosing her sanity and took that frustration out on the hallucination.Tilly was hostile to May and rightly so until this episode. Then quite suddenly May is her best friend who giving up her link to is deeply upsetting for her.
Nah. The ganglia are sauteed in butter and added on top of the Kelpburger, like onions.So, like Sliders only the sliders are small burgers with ganglia meat.
That's how I took it as well; especially as the last three episodes apparently happened in a relatively short timeframe. She probably didn't have any time to process anything that has happened yet, especially with this episode's emotional roller coaster culminating in Hugh's resurrection added to the mix, so I saw her tears as cathartic. Then again, it was all subtext, possibly unintended, and I admit it could've been presented in a much clearer way. At least she didn't have any lines in the last scene with Burnham as far as I remember, so she doesn't outright admit she's crying over May, even if their goodbye gives off that impression.
It makes sense to me.Tilly was hostile to May and rightly so until this episode. Then quite suddenly May is her best friend who giving up her link to is deeply upsetting for her.
...
We also have to take into account the character's social isolation - she has been thrust into regular interaction (including some ridiculous adventures in the Mirror Universe) with people far outside the norm for her age and mindset. She is peers with people whose rank and power are so far beyond her own that its quite unsettling.I think she was hostile towards the idea that she was seeing hallucinations, and what "seeing things" means to her sanity and thus her career. I felt Tilly was at first frustrated that she thought she was loosing her sanity and took that frustration out on the hallucination.
Ever hear of Operation Paperclip?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.