I find it disturbing on how many are so eager to make assumptions about this film without seeing it.
That IS the point of a trailer, though. To give us an idea for assumptions before seeing it.
I find it disturbing on how many are so eager to make assumptions about this film without seeing it.
It doesn't look right to my eyes. Obviously, mileage will vary, as illustrated by comments in this thread. But, it simply looks "off" like things are not syncing up quite right in terms of the body and the head.Wasn't the genie blue in the movie?
I am usually a wait and see kind of person, but this trailer didn't inspire. Trying to be understanding, as Beauty and the Beast did better than I thought it would be.Wouldn’t be the first time studios have released WiP special effects in trailers. And the finished movie looked way better.
So still a wait & see situation.
That's not the problem.Wasn't the genie blue in the movie?
The problem isn't Will Smith's performance, the problem right now is that the animation to turn him into the Genie doesn't seem to be very good.Smith is a two-time Oscar nominee. I would say that he will do just fine. Only his genie will be probably different than Williams as far as verbal skills go. Do you expect his voice style to be the same?
.
From what I've gathered from a friend who works on the Disney live action movies, these brutal deadlines are pretty much the standard operating procedure. It's really sad - this friend is a massive Disney fan, and works truly horrific hours, and yet they're just not proud of the way these films are being made.I just saw this on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ActionMovieKid/status/1095289310595637253
Sadly it doesn't seem that far from the truth.
I can believe that. I remember seeing an artist who worked on a TV show about 8 years ago saying that he'd be told in the morning, "Oh can you remake that whole environment before lunch?"From what I've gathered from a friend who works on the Disney live action movies, these brutal deadlines are pretty much the standard operating procedure. It's really sad - this friend is a massive Disney fan, and works truly horrific hours, and yet they're just not proud of the way these films are being made.
That sort of thing is why I chose to advance a certain amount in my cg visualizer role, and have no interest in getting on any further: Sure the pay is good, but I'd hardly ever come home.I can believe that. I remember seeing an artist who worked on a TV show about 8 years ago saying that he'd be told in the morning, "Oh can you remake that whole environment before lunch?"
Will Smith has been pretty bulked up and beefy at times. I'm pretty sure that's his body.
I think there's a certain CG Tarkin problem going on - that even if the image were perfect and basically unimprovable, our brains would always remember we're looking at Will Smith's actual face on a CG body, just as we could never watch a perfect CG Tarkin and forget it isn't actually Peter Cushing. Whereas with the Hulk or Gollum or Yoda, we know they're inherently entirely unreal, so that's not an issue. So, should they have gone with a completely animated CG character, kinda like the Hulk, only partly transparent? Probably.
Anyhow, the rest of the trailer just looks weirdly clean and shiny, not to mention overlit, much like the PT as compared to the lived-in feel of thee OT. My reaction is the epitome of "meh", but I haven't seen any of these Disney live-action remakes, so I guess I'm not the audience they're concerned about.
Agreed, but even then, it's not Brolin's actual whole photographed face. Sure, it's recognizably him, but the proportions are stretched just enough to avoid the Uncanny Valley and let your mind relax.I don’t know... Thanos was pretty marvelous. Pun intended.
Cinderella, The Jungle Book, and Beauty and The Beast were all good.I think there's a certain CG Tarkin problem going on - that even if the image were perfect and basically unimprovable, our brains would always remember we're looking at Will Smith's actual face on a CG body, just as we could never watch a perfect CG Tarkin and forget it isn't actually Peter Cushing. Whereas with the Hulk or Gollum or Yoda, we know they're inherently entirely unreal, so that's not an issue. So, should they have gone with a completely animated CG character, kinda like the Hulk, only partly transparent? Probably.
Anyhow, the rest of the trailer just looks weirdly clean and shiny, not to mention overlit, much like the PT as compared to the lived-in feel of thee OT. My reaction is the epitome of "meh", but I haven't seen any of these Disney live-action remakes, so I guess I'm not the audience they're concerned about.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.