Dude, just stop!Not necessarily, but let's really break this down: we have a group of angry people: predominantly white, male, and middle-aged. They're passionately devoted to a thing to the point where they feel a certain ownership of it, and they're mad because the people who control that thing aren't managing it in a way they agree with. They fervently believe that, were the founder of this thing still alive, he would completely agree with them. They feel like the people in charge have abandoned the founder's original intentions, and that it's incumbent upon them to take this thing back so that the founder's original intention for it can be restored and things can be like they were the "good old days" that never actually existed.
Add some proper nouns and that paragraph perfectly describes Axanar supporters, Discovery haters, people who don't like the direction of Star Wars since the Disney acquisition and the followers of just about any right-wing movement you can think of anywhere in the world. That was my point.
Wow - Back to beat THAT particular dead horse one more time?I can't speak regarding Discovery, as haven't gotten around do seeing it. (Probably will see it eventually, if only to be part of the cultural zeitgeist.) That said, putting the first Star Trek series in over a decade behind a paywall in the U.S. while almost simultaneously creating a set of new "guidelines" that basically forbid the kind of long-form fan film that Axanar (and many other fan films) represents is going to rub some people the wrong way, especially if they don't like the new Star Trek they now have to pay for. And some of those people are going to think, metaphorically speaking, that the enemy of their enemy is their friend. Let's not pretend it's hard to understand, even if the person they choose to ally themselves with is definitely not worthy of their trust.
I do think it's weird the way Axanar supporters and Alt-Right YouTubers who produce Trek-related content intersect. I've only recently become aware of the sheer volume of YouTubers who claim to be true fans of Star Trek, but tend to throw around terms like "SJW" unironically, and I find it a little disturbing. I'm becoming so paranoid about watching sci-fi related YouTube videos that part of me half-expects EckhartsLadder to suddenly launch into a diatribe about "the Jewish conspiracy".
I think you got that backwards. I'm pretty sure not liking it would be the excuse for not wanting to pay for it, and that would qualify for buying or renting DVDs and/or Blue Rays as well.Discovery Season 1 has been out on Blu-Ray and DVD for several months now, so not wanting to pay for CBSAA really doesn't work as an excuse for not liking it anymore.
I can't speak regarding Discovery, as haven't gotten around do seeing it. (Probably will see it eventually, if only to be part of the cultural zeitgeist.) That said, putting the first Star Trek series in over a decade behind a paywall in the U.S. while almost simultaneously creating a set of new "guidelines" that basically forbid the kind of long-form fan film that Axanar (and many other fan films) represents is going to rub some people the wrong way, especially if they don't like the new Star Trek they now have to pay for. And some of those people are going to think, metaphorically speaking, that the enemy of their enemy is their friend. Let's not pretend it's hard to understand, even if the person they choose to ally themselves with is definitely not worthy of their trust.
Only because they would move it around on the schedule so no-one knows when it's on, put in on after football / basketball and join it in-progress, pre-empt it for Disney specials, air the episodes out of order, or whatefer else they can think of to kill it.Spoilers: It's behind a pay wall because it wouldn't last a hot second on network television.
I gleefully remind you that TNG had no time slot: local stations put it on any day or time they wanted during a given week, and I dunno what your local channel did, but where I was it never moved in seven years.Only because they would move it around on the schedule ...[snip]
They did that with Babaylon 5, Space Rangers, Next Generation, and pretty much any other show they didn't understand.
Only because they would move it around on the schedule so no-one knows when it's on, put in on after football / basketball and join it in-progress, pre-empt it for Disney specials, air the episodes out of order, or whatefer else they can think of to kill it.
They did that with Babaylon 5, Space Rangers, Next Generation, and pretty much any other show they didn't understand.
I like one show on CBSAA, and that's Discovery. Plus, the app causes so many headaches for people, and up until recently did for me, too. I'd prefer it be on Netflix, where I could watch it with the hundreds of thousands of TV show and movie options I already have. I get why people might be irked because they're paying $6 a month for one show, that *still* has commercials, and is often unreliably delivered.It's funny; everyone complains about the CBSAA paywall but no one bats an eye at Netflix, Hulu or Amazon (and now Disney) doing the same thing. It's like people don't even appreciate that ~$10 a month can give you dozens of first-run TV shows and literally hundreds, if not thousands of past shows and movies ON DEMAND!
Remember those days when you had to drive to Blockbuster and pay 5.99 to rent a videotape that would occasionally streak, snow or jam at lousy SD resolution? Double that and you get a months worth of unlimited access. $50 a month can get you all the streaming services. And how long before a Comcast or FIOS subscription will include a free Hulu or Netflix subscription?
Not to mention that nearly every streaming service offers a month long free-trial.
"They" are TV execs in general.
Is that a dig at the fact I used to be a weather forecaster........???
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.