• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Movies - To Infinity and Beyond

Which is exactly what happened in JL?
I agree JL was the suits attempt at realigning the DCEU version of Suoerman; and FWIW I thought they succeeded at that, BUT for while JL was probably their best DCEU film behind "Wonder Woman"; I was disappointed they pulled Darkseid out of appearing because they didn't want to risk being 'locked' into a sequel.
 
Getting things right requires listening, not just repeating your own assumptions more loudly.

eqiBH9z.gif
 
I agree JL was the suits attempt at realigning the DCEU version of Suoerman; and FWIW I thought they succeeded at that, BUT for while JL was probably their best DCEU film behind "Wonder Woman"; I was disappointed they pulled Darkseid out of appearing because they didn't want to risk being 'locked' into a sequel.

I don't regard "Wonder Woman" or "Justice League" as the DCEU's best films.


Tyler Hoechlin has gotten a lot of praise for his work as Superman on the Supergirl TV show.

It's not that hard to get Superman right.

And he hasn't yet, because all he is doing is mimicking Chris Reeve's interpretation.


It's not that changes aren't allowed -- I'm on record many times as saying the decision to have Lois in on Clark's secret from the get-go was a great choice, even though it flies in the face of most of the characters' history and tradition. But not all changes are created equal, and a miserable, angst-ridden Superman drowning in a grimdark morass is not the way to go.

Thank you for reminding me that when it comes to certain characters or stories, people like you have no imagination or tolerance for something different or challenging. As long as the studios and production companies keep kowtowing to the likes of you, pop culture will continue to rut in a pool of mediocrity.
 
Thank you for reminding me that when it comes to certain characters or stories, people like you have no imagination or tolerance for something different or challenging. As long as the studios and production companies keep kowtowing to the likes of you, pop culture will continue to rut in a pool of mediocrity.
"The likes of me" literally made me LOL, so thanks for that. Didn't actually know my opinions on funnybook movies could constitute such a personal affront. :beer:
 
Comics accurate version?? Bullshit. This strikes me as nothing more than a too lavish display of nostalgia for Chris Reeve's performance and nothing more. Hardly anyone was bitching and moaning about how Superman should be portrayed as some one-note hero before Henry Cavill took over the role. And the comic book Superman - especially in the last two decades or so - has been a lot more complex than some boy scout in a blue leotard. Why are so many afraid of the idea of Clark Kent aka Superman having complex emotions like everyone else? What are they afraid of?
 
Comics accurate version?? Bullshit. This strikes me as nothing more than a too lavish display of nostalgia for Chris Reeve's performance and nothing more. Hardly anyone was bitching and moaning about how Superman should be portrayed as some one-note hero before Henry Cavill took over the role. And the comic book Superman - especially in the last two decades or so - has been a lot more complex than some boy scout in a blue leotard. Why are so many afraid of the idea of Clark Kent aka Superman having complex emotions like everyone else? What are they afraid of?
Strawman, much? Nobody here, or anywhere, said that Superman can't have complex emotions. It is, however, probably fair to say that most folks feel his primary emotions shouldn't be misery and confusion.

Positive emotions are emotions, too, you know. It's the province of self-dramatizing 14-year-olds (and film directors and fans who think like them) to believe truth only lies in darkness.
 
A non-white Superman is possibly a dumber idea than having Jonathan Kent telling Clark that saving a busload of drowning kids was NOT necessarily the right thing to do.

All it would be is Hollywood forcing their political correctness and doing their race baiting so that their sheep gets to call anyone who objects to the lunacy a racist and be fake outraged.

Just like it did with Fantastic Four, and just like it did with Ghostbusters, the casting will cause a backlash, which will affect the movie's grosses. It's just ridiculous.

There are plenty of non-white characters that are great. And there are plenty of non-white characters that have yet to be created that will be great. Superman is a white guy.
 
Uhm, no. Let me put it as plainly as possible:

1. For years, some people have been incessantly and vitriolically complaining about Superman
2. Those same people are now shocked and outraged that WB is reluctant to make another Superman movie.

To me, this is just absurd. Your mileage may vary. :shrug:
I think you're attributing too much importance to vocal fan opinion. The studio suits don't care about that nearly as much as we do. They're looking at their line graphs.
 
Probably just a negotiating tactic. I doubt he’s gone. Who would want to give up playing Superman. Before doing the definitive Superman movie. He’s only done the origin story so far

Don’t mistake your feelings about a role for Cavill’s. You don’t know if this is as important to him as it is to you. If it was, he wouldn’t be negotiating so hard and taking a role that removed him from playing Superman for long stretches at a time.

A non-white Superman is possibly a dumber idea than having Jonathan Kent telling Clark that saving a busload of drowning kids was NOT necessarily the right thing to do.

All it would be is Hollywood forcing their political correctness and doing their race baiting so that their sheep gets to call anyone who objects to the lunacy a racist and be fake outraged.

Just like it did with Fantastic Four, and just like it did with Ghostbusters, the casting will cause a backlash, which will affect the movie's grosses. It's just ridiculous.

There are plenty of non-white characters that are great. And there are plenty of non-white characters that have yet to be created that will be great. Superman is a white guy.

Race baiting. Lol.

See, now, I want to see a person of color play Superman—really no reason he can’t—just so I can watch the internet burn as fan boys get their panties in a twist, being all triggered because it’s not “their” Superman. Lol.

Ghostbusters didn’t fail because it was a female cast, Fantastic Four didn’t fail because of a black Johnny Storm, they were both TERRIBLE movies.
 
Race baiting. Lol.

See, now, I want to see a person of color play Superman—really no reason he can’t—just so I can watch the internet burn as fan boys get their panties in a twist, being all triggered because it’s not “their” Superman. Lol.

Ghostbusters didn’t fail because it was a female cast, Fantastic Four didn’t fail because of a black Johnny Storm, they were both TERRIBLE movies.

Ghostbusters wasn't that bad, actually (no worse than the old GB movies), but it certainly never had the makings of a hit, regardless.

And I rather strongly suspect that any hypothetical black Superman movie, just by sheer force of novelty, would bring in more box office than Justice League.
 
Don’t mistake your feelings about a role for Cavill’s. You don’t know if this is as important to him as it is to you. If it was, he wouldn’t be negotiating so hard and taking a role that removed him from playing Superman for long stretches at a time.



Race baiting. Lol.

See, now, I want to see a person of color play Superman—really no reason he can’t—just so I can watch the internet burn as fan boys get their panties in a twist, being all triggered because it’s not “their” Superman. Lol.

Ghostbusters didn’t fail because it was a female cast, Fantastic Four didn’t fail because of a black Johnny Storm, they were both TERRIBLE movies.

Yes. Race baiting. That's all this is. And yes, there is a reason a person of color can't play Superman. The character is white, and the only reason to do it is race baiting. But your own response proves the point. You want to enjoy the reaction to the race baiting.

And hate to break it to you, but yes, Ghostbusters and Fantastic Four failed in part because of those decisions. They had strikes against them.
Maybe we should recast Black Panther with a white actor. Then you can watch the internet burn.
 
Ghostbusters wasn't that bad, actually (no worse than the old GB movies), but it certainly never had the makings of a hit, regardless.

Oh, I disagree. The constant diversion because of improv deflated any sort of tension. Whereas the original Ghostbusters was focused funny and exciting.

GB2 is a terrible movie. A desperate grasp for money.

And I rather strongly suspect that any hypothetical black Superman movie, just by sheer force of novelty, would bring in more box office than Justice League.

Possibly. It would certainly have an interesting PR ride.
 
Yes. Race baiting. That's all this is. And yes, there is a reason a person of color can't play Superman. The character is white, and the only reason to do it is race baiting. But your own response proves the point. You want to enjoy the reaction to the race baiting.

And hate to break it to you, but yes, Ghostbusters and Fantastic Four failed in part because of those decisions. They had strikes against them.
Maybe we should recast Black Panther with a white actor. Then you can watch the internet burn.

What part of Superman’s story requires him to be white?

None.

What part of a king of a secretive African nation that has existed for centuries that was never conquered by Europeans requires him to be black?

All of it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top