Look at Cavills Instagram post. Jordan confirmed.Michael b Jordon? It’s not April Fools.![]()
Look at Cavills Instagram post. Jordan confirmed.Michael b Jordon? It’s not April Fools.![]()
Could be just messing with people.Look at Cavills Instagram post. Jordan confirmed.
Robert DeNiro is a great actor. Why not have HIM play Superman? Or Meryl Streep?
Tom Hanks as Superman?
Why not? As long as they are making stupid decisions and miscasting the role, might as well go all in
I have no problems with a non-white Superman.
I've never had a problem with Cavill as the character. It's not his fault they gave him shitty scripts to work with. Plus, he wants to be a working actor, so it's not his fault WB can't work with him on scheduling a cameo for Shazzam.If Cavill thinks he can get a big pay raise and more creative control along with a Superman sequel. He won't. Especially not after Justice League flopped.
Studios reward actors to get them successful movies, not movies that lose money.
His Superman has never been that well liked.
WB can sit back do nothing with the Superman character for the next 10 years if they want.
WB can do what they did with Brandon Routh, basically sit back and do nothing until they are ready to announce a new Superman movie with new actor playing Superman. WB waited 3 years for Roth's contract to expire instead of firing him.
They are basically doing the same thing with Affleck and Batman right now.
I've never had a problem with Cavill as the character.
I love how people who have been relentlessly negative about the DCEU and his Superman all over these forums for five friggin' years are now suddenly like "Well where on Earth did WB get the idea to replace him?"![]()
He was potentially a great Superman but was never really given the chance to be one. So there is no contradiction there at all.
The contradiction comes from expecting him to be "given a chance" when the extremely hostile and toxic environment created around his Superman is anything but conductive to convincing the suits that this is what they should be doing.
You can count me in as one of the "we" who doesn't blame Cavill...though i would say we DID see glimpses of the Superman we want...You're not hearing me. It's not "his Superman" that we object to, because that phrasing implies that we think he's to blame for the problems. That's missing the point. Cavill is the part that worked. His Superman -- his performance in the role -- was excellent (except in BvS, where he had no actual character to play). It's everyone else's treatment of Superman that we have a problem with -- the plotting, the writing, the directing, the CGI mustache-erasing, etc. If the suits think we've been blaming Cavill, then they're the ones who aren't listening, or are too prideful to accept that they're the ones to blame.
You're not hearing me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.